Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Re: an alien face in Jung's UFO book

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: meccam@erols.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:17:04 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:02:56 -0400
Subject: Re: an alien face in Jung's UFO book


> From: clark@canby.mn.frontiercomm.net [Jerome Clark]
> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 07:57:50 PDT
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: RE: UFO UpDate: Re: an alien face in Jung's UFO book

> >Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 22:24:09 -0700
> >From: John Koopmans <john.koopmans@sympatico.ca>
> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: an alien face in Jung's UFO book

> Folks,

> I'm all for restricting the focus.  Having spent a whole
> lot of time studying the question -- and even, long ago,
> shared sentiments generally like those expressed with such
> enthusiasm above -- I see no evidence that  the "phenomena
> appears [sic] to be very related [not just related, note,
> but "very" related] to phenomena" of the sorts our
> correspondents are discussing here.

> I see a lot of people making these sorts of sweeping
> statements.  I don't see anybody actually documenting them.
> In separate studies Eddie Bullard and I have shown why UFOs
> do not seem to be related to other anomalous or folkloric
> phenomena.  No one has attempted a serious refutation.
> Ufology, people, is not a branch of occultism.  If it were,
> the CSICOP people would be right, and we'd all be wasting our
> time.  I don't believe we're wasting our time, but I do believe
> speculations like the above consume attention more productively
> spent in actual study of UFO reports.

> Jerry Clark

I agree.  Being cognizant of those authors and their subjects does not
necessarily imply that one should be non-discriminating in one's
classifications of "ETs" versus "anything else."

Melanie


 - an apple is an apple, a pear is a pear, and a watermelon is a
watermelon.  They may all be fruits (like us! :) ) but characteristics
are different


> \_______________________________________________/