Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jun -> 'Debunker' Kent Jeffery: How Do We Stop Him!

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: James A Diss <76710.234@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 20 Jun 97 14:26:34 EDT
Fwd Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 16:58:30 -0400
Subject: 'Debunker' Kent Jeffery: How Do We Stop Him!

>From: EdKomarek@aol.com
>Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 12:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: 'Debunker' Kent Jeffery:  How Do We >Stop Him! <<

Ed Wrote;

>Thank goodness there are a few seasoned UFO veterans like  Bob Shell
>who know the score.

I'm obviously confused.  Bob claimed to have no real interest in
UFOs back in the summer of '95.  I take it that 2 years is considered
'veteran'?

Is 17 years considered 'Methusalan'?

>In order for a coverup of this magnitude  to succeed requires
>that UFO/ET truths be kept from the mainstream press and public awareness.

Thank god they've managed to hush it so far, eh?

>Its time  to
>defend ourselves from psychological attacks such as these.  Otherwise the
>coverup will may never end.

I personally see no psychological attack in someone telling what they
perceive as the truth to them.  We might as well tag the information that
Milton released as a psychological attack, the Dulce papers being an
extension that was *intended* to cause a modicum of panic.

If Kent has done what he feels is right, however long it worried him
then I think we should be a tad more supportive of someone who actually
had the balls to suggest the thing in the first place rather than scream
'Jihad!' everytime a beloved member of the flock turns.

The threat of that scenario is more psychological than one man's actions.
what it boils down to is an innate desire to see someone beaten for
rescinding the word of Roswell rather than actually providing a link between
the USAF and any one researcher.

Bet your sweet bippy this is political, but it's more to do with the perceived
gathering of power in an audience rather than the machiavellian manueverings
of secret government organisations, most of which don't even seem to talk to one
another, let alone being able to co-ordinate conspiracies of the nature that
are considered everyday fodder for the Internet.

James A Diss
 ----------------------
 HEALTH WARNING: Care Should Be Taken When Lifting
 This Product, Since Its Mass, and Thus Its
 Weight, Is Dependent on Its Velocity Relative
 to the User.
 --------------------