UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Andromeda0@aol.com Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:53:11 -0400 (EDT) Fwd Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:11:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Air Force Final Report - NOT! > From: DONFEII@aol.com > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 12:59:25 -0400 (EDT) > Fwd Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:20:18 -0400 > Subject: Re: Air Force Final Report - NOT! > Special release from UFO Magazine. > Don Ecker > The AIR FORCE releases its "Final Report" > During all this, archival film footage was being shown with what > looked like advanced aircraft and space probes being > demonstrated, some re-entering the atmosphere or sitting on the > ground looking for all the world like... a flying saucer! Not too > bad, until you start to use common sense--which, by the looks of > it, isn't too common. > Forget for a second that in 1947, the men stationed at the > Roswell Army Air Field were the most elite in the U.S. military. > This was, after all, the only location on the entire planet that > harbored atomic weapons and the means to deliver them. But these > men, we are to believe, couldn't distinguish between a balloon > and its array and a real flying saucer! > Forget that this military organization, the 509th, was the one to > release the original press brief stating they captured a flying > disk-- not parts, not pieces, but a whole disk. Read the original > story published in the Roswell Daily Record. > Hardly a mention at all that the Air Force's high-altitude > balloon experiments that involved dropping dummies never began > until 1954. In other words, these "stupid" people confused the > events of Roswell with events that did not happen until at least > seven years later! > The crash of a KC-97 aircraft which killed 11 men--also in the > Air Force report-- happened in 1956! This is nine years later! > The balloon mishap in which 2 pilots were injured did not occur > until 1959! Well stated here Don, I would just like to add one thing (please anyone feel free to correct me here if I'm wrong) It's been my understanding that none of the Roswell crash witnesses like Frank Kauffman and such ever asserted that the crashed UFO was saucer shaped. in fact, none of them said that it was even round. Wasn't the accepted shape of the UFO that crashed a delta-wing configuration that was cracked in the center? This little detail was really going through my mind as I watched the CNN coverage of the press conference and Haynes' descriptions of footage that were showing saucer shaped lifting bodies attached to ballons and parachutes. All the time I was wondering to myself "I don't think the Air Force got the shape right, here" Jared.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com