UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: "Steven J. Powell" <sjpowell@access.digex.net> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 12:02:41 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 13:57:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Devereux-Rutkowski: EL/TST Debate >From: DevereuxP@aol.com >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 19:50:23 -0500 (EST) >To: updates@globalserve.net >Subject: Devereux-Rutowski: EL/TST Debate >EL can be as large (eg. at Hessdalen) as reported UFOs; if they >are a form of plasma, as seems likely (most scientists are >assuming that for ball lightning, for instance) , then they can >appear glowing and multicoloured at night, and appear as >metallic-looking disks and globes in daylight. Can they be picked up on airport radar? Wouldn't radar tapes from airports near seismically active areas be an excellent data source? > SPECIAL NOTE: With regard to 'energy' dowsing, I have for 15 or > more years been the chief critic of such claims in the UK - and > you can check that with any neutral observer (try Bob Rickard if > you like, editor of *Fortean Times*). I have been hated, abused, > and otherwise reviled by New Age circles and dowsing groups > because of my emphatic opposition to their nonsense. Do you feel the same about 'water' dowsing? >When we were doing our work in Wales, a certain person in the >Edinburgh Seismological Unit (who shall remain nameless) told me >that when he retired, he would write a book on the LP- seismic >connection. "You should see what we have here," he said, >tauntingly! Is it possible to guess at the type/kind of data this person is referring to? >I'll state my current position regarding EL, to minimise, if >possible, misunderstandings. > i) I am going for a tectonic connection with EL because EQL > *are* produced (let us not be ridiculously coy about this), > and it therefore seems a logical starting point. Investigation > to date provides a broad base of evidence - in addition to > Persinger's work on the TST - suggesting this approach is > reasonably founded. But I do not rule out meteorological > elements as well - and, quite probably, other factors of which > we are unaware at present. > ii) I think the brand of EQL we call EL sometimes display > sufficiently distinct characteristics, which I have described > partially here and fully elsewhere, to warrant that special > designation. >iii) EL reportedly behave as if that have electromagnetic > properties, but also, at times, seem to display more exotic > ones unfamiliar to the current state of geophysics. One > reason for this, I suspect, from study of hundreds of cases, > is that macro-quantum characteristics are displayed. > Macro-quantal phenomena have been produced in the laboratory, > and quantum scientists with whom I have discussed this matter > accept the possibility. But, we'll see. iv) I do *not* think > EL account for most UFO sightings. I think most UFO reports > can be deconstructed into psychosocial phenomena. I do think > some reports do relate to actual unexplained phenomena, > however, and so far I am satisfied that those limited number > of cases can be studied from the EL angle. If anything ever > comes up to convince me to modify that view, I will readily > do so. That leaves the better cases such as Westchester/Long Island, Cash-Landrum, Bentwaters, Belgium, Gulf Breeze, etc. Thanks, take care. John. ([]][][][][][][][][][][][][][]) [ ] [ sjpowell@access.digex.net ] [ ] ([]][][][][][][][][][][][][][])
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com