Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Mar -> Re: UFO photo or artist's impression?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: BGBOPPER@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 18:59:11 -0500
Fwd Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 18:59:11 -0500
Subject: Re: UFO photo or artist's impression?

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 21:15:02 -0500 (EST)

To: updates@globalserve.net

Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: UFO photo or artist's impression?


 >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: UFO photo or artist's impression?

 >Date: Sun, 23 Mar 97 19:14:52 +0000

 >From: Ralf Zeigermann <<kag15@dial.pipex.com>

 >To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <<updates@globalserve.net>



 >>Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 13:48:35 +0100

 >>To: updates@globalserve.net

 >>From: John Joseph Mercieca <<mufor@maltanet.net>

 >>Subject: UFO photo or artist's impression?



 >>I've just been sent the attached image that is supposedly a photo

 >>of a UFO taken in Florida in February.



 >>It looks to me that the "photo" is really an artist's impression

 >>of a triangular ufo.  I'd be glad if anyone with any graphics

 >>knowledge could take a look at it and comment on whether it is

 >>really a photo or not.



 Ralf writes,



 >Hi John,



 >the attached jpeg is neither a photograph nor an 'artist's
impression'-

 >it's something made up in Photoshop with the help of a couple of

 >filters and plug-ins ('lens flare'...grin).



 >It's not even done good, not even a piece of art...sorry. The more

 >I think about it: it's awful. Disgusting. Terrible. Most unfortunate.



 >Gee...



 >Cheers,

 >Ralf



John Velez wrote:




<excerpt>>Hiya John & Ralf,

>I concur Ralf! Photoshop 4.0 to be precise. Although (as artwork)

> I think it's pretty cool! As a 'hoax attempt' it's piss-poor.



>John Velez, Happy Mac owner

</excerpt>




Yup... Tis true.... One more vote for Photoshop lens flairs.


How many more would ya like <<Grin>

Russ Estes