From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 11:52:22 -0400 Fwd Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 11:52:22 -0400 Subject: Re: Financing For Hearings In Congress,(idea) >From: EdKomarek@aol.com >Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 15:24:11 -0400 (EDT) >To: updates@globalserve.net >cc: skywatch@phoenix.net, iufo@world.std.com >Subject: Re, Re Financing For Hearings In Congress,(idea) >>Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 00:50:52 -0500 (CDT) >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net> >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Financing For Hearings In Congress,(idea) >>>A POTENTIAL INTRODUCTORY LETTER >>>Toward gaining corporate financing for hearings in Congress >>>By Ed Komarek [snip] >>I happen to personally know the CEO of a Fortune 500 company >>-- involved in aeronautics -- and I can assure you that your >>letter, as worded, will not get past the proverbial first base. >>In the unlikely event that it does, however, it will do us more >>harm than good. >>"Oh, ufologists," I can hear him saying now. "Aren't they the >>people who can't even spell, let alone back up their claims? >>And I'm supposed to put my good corporate name (and that of my >>stockholders) behind their efforts to petition congress? Maybe >>when pigs fly -- unless you try to tell me that flying pigs are >>reverse-engineered UFOs." [snip] > Come on Dennis give me a break. That was simply a draft letter >posted to a list. I edit and publish my own newspaper, Citizens Oversight, >with a run of 30,000 copies that is just as good or better than any other >newspaper in this area. I of course use spell check which I don't happen to >have with this aol email. I just don't have the time right now to edit and >spell check stuff. I would rather use the time in a more advantagous manner. >Just hold you nose and read! Ed, Your letter, as you so glibly put it, is _not_ "simply a draft letter to a list"! Your headers show you posted to at least two other lists. Of the three, two, that I know of, are archived on a publicly accessed web-site. There are probably many thousands of people reading your 'drafts'. Citing "time" really does not make it. What's wrong with composing your posts in a program that _does_ spell check and then copying and pasting 'em into your AOL software? >As for the rest of your post, well what can I say? A few errors in a >draft letter are relatively easy to correct. Your post speaks volumes about >you, MUFON and the quality of your leadership in that organization. Tsk, tsk, Ed. Dennis made some valid points that don't warrant a pissy, personal-attack. He's right. You need to think a little harder about the overall image of ufology. Don't post 'draft' letters in _very_ public forums. If you _really_ want to help, use email to solicit opinions and suggestions - hell, there are a dozen or so damn good writers on this List who would be most happy to pool talent, privately, in order to _make_ points for ufology. Errol
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com