UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: jvif@spacelab.net (John Velez)
Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 00:22:35 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 04:38:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Book: 'Left at East Gate'??
>From: KRandle993@aol.com [Kevin Randle]
>Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 16:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Book: 'Left at East Gate'??
> The facts seem to be that Larry Warren wasn't on base when the events
>took place. Even Warren has admitted that he wasn't there. So how could
>he possibly provide eyewitness testimony.
>KRandle
===========================================================================
Hello Kevin, hi All,
A piece of information has come into my possesion which
I think should go to post. However, I don't want to get
caught in the middle of a barrage of questions. I am not
an expert on the Bentwaters case. The following post speaks
for itself, anyone with any questions should direct them to
the originators of the post.
Once again it boils down to doing what my conscience says
is the "right" thing! I only wish that it would have fallen
into the hands of someone else, I really don't like getting
in the middle of something that has nothing to do with me in
the first place.
John Velez
-------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt)
On November 6th/88, Lawrence (Larry) Fenwick, noted Canadian
UFOlogist was interviewed for ParaNet on Sunday afternoon at
the Toronto residence of ParaNet Pi Sysop, Tom Mickus. He had
previously agreed to this interview, with the full knowledge
that it was being taped, and that the transcript would be
released for distribution on the North American ParaNet System.
==============================================================
Regarding Bentwaters:
<Mickus> "And how many air force personnel do you believe
witnessed this..."
<Fenwick> "It depends on what part you're talking about, the
underground meeting, or the above ground meeting.
There were at least a dozen people involved in that
case. And there were military policeman involved. One
chap who wasn't there, who claimed originally to have
been there, was a fellow named Larry Warren. He actually
heard it from someone else, another military policeman
who was at the underground meeting with the Men In Black
[MIB] supposedly. Giving instructions."
<Mickus> "But not much is known about that meeting?"
<Fenwick> "No, its only referred to very briefly in the book by
Jenny Randles and Dot Street, 'Skycrash'. There's
another authoress, but I've forgotten her name. I think
there's about one or two sentence about that in the
whole book. And that was probably the most important
aspect of it...and they couldn't get any more information
on that. I've got an unpublished manuscript by Larry
Warren at home...part of one chapter really...about 10
pages. He's writing a book, so he said that this is not
for publication...and he talked about some of his
experiences, not there...but as a Military policeman
being transferred to some secret NSA facilities in
Egypt, and another one in Florida."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
End quote
Apparently Larry Warren began writing another book in 1988 about
his experiences as a military security policeman with _no_mention_
of the Bentwaters incident. (Odd) It is this partial manuscript,
and (I surmise) direct contact with Larry Warren that Mr Fenwick has
based his remarks on. If this is so, then,...
If anyone knows this "Fenwick" gentleman he should be contacted.
First, for confirmation of the above statements, and secondly, to
find out if he can produce the manuscript that he derived this
information from.
I personally found Warren's response to Randle lacking. I originally
involved myself because Warren's co-author 'Peter Robbins' is a good
friend of mine. I thought that Peter might be hurt by the charges that
Randle had leveled and that he deserved an opportunity to respond.
But the bottom line is, if Warren is 'telling tales out of school'
that takes precedence over whether a friend may have been duped or
not! I really value Peter and his friendship. I most sincerely hope,
for Peters' sake, that Warren proves to be 'on the level'.
If not, then let the chips fall where they may. I'm interested in truth
only when it comes to the subject of UFO's. If I want sci-fi I'll read
Kurt Vonnegut! Randle is 100% correct on one count, the Bentwaters case
is too important to let questions, such as the one he has caused, go
unanswered. Which is essentially what Warren has done in his response to
Randle. Warren's post _was_ a non-response.
Let's see where this one leads us! I almost feel as if I've loosed
the hounds of Hell! I hope that some of our more experienced and
responsible members pick up on this thread and do a little
constructive snooping on behalf of us all! <G>
I await further developments along with the rest of you.
Truth, is (all) that matters.
John Velez
*
***
*****
*******
=======================================
* jvif@spacelab.net *
* * * INTRUDERS FOUNDATION ONLINE * * *
* www.spacelab.net/~jvif/bhhp.html *
=======================================
*******
*****
***
*
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com