Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Oct -> Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: rfsignal@sprynet.com [Cathy Johnsom]
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 20:14:13 -0700
Fwd Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 23:18:10 -0400
Subject: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

Dear Errol and List,


>Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 15:20:15 -0500 (CDT)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis <dstacy@texas.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: "Serge Salvaille" <sergesa@connectmmic.net>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words
>>Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 13:42:53 -0500

>>Dear Barbara [Becker],

>>You have mentioned...

>>>Yes, Independent (that means he looked at the photos WITHOUT
>>>an agenda) photoanalyst Wm. Hyzer, however his report was
>>>disregarded by MUFON.

<--------snip--------->

>To summarize, however, Hyzer essentially concludes that the famous
>Polaroid series of pictures released by Walters are hoaxes,
>specifically double-exposures. To cite but one example, the famous
>"road shot," Hyzer concluded that reflections from the photographed
>object should have appeared in the scene reflected on the hood of
>Ed's pickup, since the background treeline did. Ergo, the object was
>not physically present at the time the picture was taken.

	Can I ask how a poleroid camera be made to double expose any
of its film?  And, another point I'd like to ask concerning the hood
reflections.  If there was nothing else besides the tree line being
reflected on the hood, wouldn't it be logical to assume that the
object was further away than the treeline, and much larger in size to
be visible in the picture at all?  I don't know for sure, but I
thought I would ask.

Take care for now,
Cathy Johnson