Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Sep -> Re: Corso and 'Alien' Transistors

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Michael Christol <mchristo@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 13:06:35 -0400 (EDT)
Fwd Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 13:52:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Corso and 'Alien' Transistors


>Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 13:05:44 +0100
>From: Don Ledger <dledger@istar.ca>
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Corso and 'Alien' Transistors

>> I have a source, which I cannot reveal at this time, which told me
>> that the integrated-circuit technology was developed not from the
>> Roswell Crash in 1947, but from a crash in 1942.  That is all I
>> can tell you at this time.
>> I leave it up to the sleuths to check out this lead.  Or, you can
>> just trash it and continue argueing among yoursleves about Roswell.

>> REgards, Mike

>Hi Mike and List,

>What lead? You're going to have to give us a little more than that to go
>on. We're not a bunch of psychics.<G> And you are never going to stop
>this List from arguing about Roswell. Tis it's raison d'etre.
>You can still give out more information without comprimising your
>source. For instance "where" and "how" and even narrow focus the "when".

>What do you say Mike. Show us the money. After all, any one of us could
>throw something like that into the pot.

>Don Ledger


Hi Don.

Yes, I could give more info on what I posted.  However, I keep reading
all of the rebuttals on the list by the self appointed "experts," so
I think for now I will refrain from giving any further data.
These people seem to have all of the answers, so let them search it
out.

Nothing Persoal toward you Don, but I get so tired of all of the
arguement and putdown on this list, that I really want to see if
we do have anyone here who can take that small lead, and check
it out, finding the event mentioned.  It will occupy their time
and possibly cut down on the negative traffic they post.

Hey, I want to see this field come to closure.  It never will,
so long as "experts" are allowed to keep stiring the pot.  What
will eventually do so is when the "grass roots" investigators
dig out the facts.

We may not be a bunch of psychics, Don.  But there are enterprising
investigators, who have uncovered quite a bit of information in the
past on  "a lot less info" than I gave.

So, for now, I will just keep it to myself.  I want to see what
effect this info has on the speculation about the "invention
of the semi-conductor and integrated chip.

REgards, Mike