Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Sep -> Re:

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Re:

From: Mark Cashman <mcashman@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 12:38:54 -0700
Fwd Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 12:57:43 -0400
Subject: Re: 


>From: c549597@showme.missouri.edu [Barbara Becker]
>Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 22:42:42 -0500
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: The Question of UFO Witness Anonymity

>I think it would be more appropriate for an "experiencer" to seek out a
>qualified therapist, someone familiar with the syndrome, preferably in
>the UFO field

I'm not sure I agree that the hypnotist should be in the UFO
field. It would be preferable (for theraputic reasons), and
more credible as well, to have a hypnotist who was not in the
field. This is one reason that the Hill case has retained a
special status for so many years, and it may, as well, be the
reason that the Hills emerged from the theraputic process
fairly well adjusted to the trauma of their experience.

In addition, I have read some comment, which I generally
agree with, indicating that the qualities required from the
hypnotist for an abduction hypnosis session are not entirely
theraputic. First, there is the issue of whether the witness
is describing objective truth. This would seem to require a
forensic psychiatry background. Second is the potentially
violent emotional reaction of the abductee to the experience,
which requires a certain amount of theraputic background,
preferably with abuse / rape cases. I would imagine that the
combination of these two skill sets in one individual is
relatively rare.

It seems to me from a casual reading of the abduction
literature, that the emphasis has been largely on the second
aspect of the abduction, but that the first - the objective
truth aspect - has been somewhat neglected.

While discussion of IFOs is de rigeur in UFO studies, I have
seen nothing of the sort in abduction studies. I perhaps have
asked this before, but I don't recall there being a clear
answer: what proportion of hypnotically elicited or
consciously recalled abduction accounts can be attributed to
some cause other than actual abduction? If we don't know that,
or the figures are soft, it is yet another sign that forensic
psychiatrists are needed in the investigations.

Keith Basterfield wrote recently on UFO-L about the studies of FPP
(Fantasy Prone Personality) (I believe by CUFOS) and its relation to
abductions, with the conclusion of those studies performed so far being
that FPP could not account for all abductions. But can anyone answer
whether these studies found any proportion of abductions which could
be attributed to FPP?

Finally, it seems to me that there are several possible scenarios to
account for any specific abduction account revealed through hypnosis

1) An abduction actually occurred

2) The hypnotist caused the witness to confabulate some or all of the
   experience

3) The witness confabulated some or all of the experience out of a
   desire to please the investigator and / or the hypnotist

4) The witness is FPP

5) The witness is affected by some other psychological disorder,
   possibly previously unknown

Obviously it is critical to distinguish between these, but since
a UFO-knowledgable hypnotist could bias the result incorrectly
toward (1) or to a (2/3) whose likelihood will not be able to be
determined, and may not perform the tests required to establish
(4/5), it seems to me that a UFO-knowledgable hypnotist is
undesirable for reasons of determining the objective truth of the
account.

From the viewpoint of therapy, it seems to me that the only time
UFO knowledge is beneficial is in therapy related to (1). Any
other time, such therapy could emphasize the reality of a
confabulated or fantasized experience and would actually be
counterproductive.

Of course, I'm only an interested layman with regard to
psychiatry, so I certainly would be interested in the
comments of any professional psychiatrists with regard to
the above opinions.

If anyone is interested in the recent post on FPP and
abductions, I could post it to the list.

-------
Mark Cashman, creator of the Temporal Doorway at
http://www.geocities.com/~mcashman
http://www.infohaus.com/access/by-seller/The_Temporal_Doorway_Storefront
Original digital art, writing and UFO research
mcashman@ix.netcom.com
--------------------------------



Search for other documents to/from: mcashman | c549597

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.


[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.