Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Sep -> Here

From: Dennis <dstacy@texas.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:42:15 -0500 (CDT)
Fwd Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 01:06:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Documentation of the transistor's invention

>Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 12:27:21 -0400
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
>Subject: Re: Documentation of the transistor's invention

>But I have to ask how your view of Corso and the others named above impacts
>your editorial viewpoint at the MUFON Journal?  You've indicated that there
>isn't enough time, and their aren't enough submissions, to allow for a full
>juried review of the articles that are forwarded to the Journal for
>consideration.  However, one of the functions of an "Editor" would seem to
>be to determine what should be included, or excluded, in the publication.
>If you believe those listed are all spouting nonsense (which is certainly a
>valid point of view), how does that impacts your consideration of articles
>submitted by them, or about their theories or viewpoints.
>

To be brief (I'm leaving early tomorrow on vacation), but hopefully not
glib, the answer to your question can be found in any issue of the Journal.
After I published the Jeffrey article, I published a lengthy rebuttal by
Randle; after I published Pflock's highly critical review of Corso's book I
published Woods' less than highly critical review of same. After I
criticized Leir & Sims in the August issue, I published their response in
the September number. The record speaks for itself. I routinely publish
material with which I personally disagree.

If you want to give the Corso book the time of day, then I certainly won't
stand in your way.

>Rebecca has also indicated in one of her responses that there are changes
>under consideration by the MUFON Journal, and I'm sure there are many on
>this list that would like to know what types of changes are under
>consideration.

Everyone who receives the Journal got a Journal survey with their most
recent issue. One of the options therein is to remove the present editor.

Vote your conscience.

Dennis