UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: XianneKei@aol.com Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Fwd Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:52:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Cheap Shots >From: Theresa <Tcarlson1@compuserve.com> >Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 03:35:19 -0400 >Fwd Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:01:40 -0400 >Subject: Re: Cheap Shots >Everyone is entitled to an opinion -- even you. But this sounds more a >personal beef with Stacy than anything else. > Yes, I suppose it could be looked at like that. But > considering it was you that suggested I send it out to > Mr. Stacy and I didn't think it was a cheap shot, it > might be a matter of perception. I just thought you > found it amusing, as I did. I wasn't amused. The only reason I suggested you forward it to Dennis is because you posted on Compuserve with direct questions to Dennis. Since Dennis wasn't on Compuserve, I doubt that he would have seen it there. Besides, my suggestion that you forward came AFTER you actually forwarded it, so methinks, you sent it on your own and without any help from me. At the UFO UpDates Archive, your message header looks like this: From: Theresa <110213.3274@compuserve.com> [Theresa Carlson] Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 02:47:53 -0400 Fwd Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 08:48:18 -0400 Subject: MUFON Journal Muses Your message in the MUFON section on CompuServe indicates that it was posted: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 2:49:04 AM My reply to you in the MUFON section on CompuServe was posted: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 11:14:54 AM Those are central daylight times, BTW. To me it looks like you acted on your own by sending here. IF you had not sent it here, it would have even been a "cheaper shot" because it was a message posted in a place that Dennis would have had no chance to respond to, and the message was CLEARLY directed to him. > On the other hand it could be a lot of other things > too. Like drawing attention to something, namely a > book in this particular instance, that might have gone > unnoticed by those that didn't see the reviews. Or maybe > don't get the MUFON UFO Journal. Yes, maybe that was your motive, but personally, I doubt that. > I don't know, but I wonder about it, now that you > brought it up. Is it worth discussing in depth? I don't know Theresa. This list discusses many things, but I am disturbed to think that you tried to say that I was the reason you sent the message to this list, when clearly as indicated by the timing of the messages, my suggestion had nothing to do with it. That seems a little dishonest to me. Rebecca
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com