UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Gary Alevy <galevy@pipeline.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 15:35:48 -0400 Fwd Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:41:59 -0400 Subject: Re: NASA's Mars Images May Show Archeological Site > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> > From: Mark Cashman <mcashman@ix.netcom.com> > Subject: re: UFO UpDate: Re: NASA's Mars Images May Show Archeological Site > Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:06:25 -0700 > > From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>, on 9/13/97 8:46 PM: > > Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 08:42:46 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@ucs.orst.edu> > > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> > > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: NASA's Mars Images May Show Archeological Site > > In the meanwhile, of course, it is taking all kinds of very good pictures, > > probably including some closer close-up shots of the Cydonia region than > > we'll get from the later circularized orbit. And that will give them > > plenty of time to figure out how to handle the coverup. E.g., that will > > allow them to select inconclusive photos to show to the public first, > > which will only hint that the Face is a genuine artifact, and then after > > the impact of that has been absorbed, they could show more definitive > > ones, etc. That's if they wish to expose this part of the coverup. > > Otherwise, it could give them time to doctor up the photos in some way. > The problem with this kind of "reasoning" is that it > a priori assumes that the Face is an artifact, and > that there is a conspiracy. In the event that the > Face actually is not a remnant of an alien > civilization, then this kind of "reasoning" will be > used to show that it must be an alien artifact anyway. > The problem is that the only answer that would be > acceptable to a person holding this view would be > NASA confirming the Face as an alien artifact. If > they do, they're right. If they don't, they're lying. > It's not a very scientific approach to the problem. > ------- > Mark Cashman, creator of the Temporal Doorway at Mark, The problem is that you do not seem to understand that this is NOT a scientific issue. The facts are: 1) The spacecraft is in orbit now. 2) The public is being told that until the orbit is circularized in March 1998, mapping cannot begin. The point is that the spacecraft is capable of and will be acquiring images now. In fact the eccentricity of the orbit will allow pictures from a lower altitude than after the orbit is circularized. The public will not be shown images NASA has stated until after the "mapping" has begun. So the public is being misled, this is a policy issue and perhaps an intelligence issue. NASA and its scientist Malin who is handling the orbiters photography have issued several evasive and contradictory statements regarding their ability and willingness to image the Cydonia region without prior constraint, let alone image the so called "face". Several peer-reviewed publications by scientists have been written on the Cydonia region which have concluded that the images are not tricks of light and shadows as was previously maintained by NASA, nonetheless NASA and its spokes people have displayed a seemingly unscientific interest in further investigation of this area. Remember NASA is not a wholly civilian scientific agency, there are many factors in play. Even Dan Goldin, NASAs administrator is a self described "Cold Warrior". Gary Alevy
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com