From: KRandle993 <KRandle993@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 14:11:01 EDT
Fwd Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 14:31:24 -0400
Subject: Re: Any More News Regarding Roswell?

In a message dated 98-04-26 11:02:26 EDT, you write:


 From: KRandle993 <KRandle993@aol.com> [Kevin Randle]
 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 09:45:19 EDT
 To: updates@globalserve.net
 Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: JPL 'Kent' Exposed

 >Subject: JPL 'Kent' Exposed
 >Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 17:14:28 +0100
 >From: Ralf Zeigermann <kag15@dial.pipex.com>
 >To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>


 >>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >>Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 08:09:10 -0400
 >>Subject: JPL 'Kent' Exposed

 > Oww ... an obvious nutcase has now been 'exposed' by Oates and
 > Hoagland? A cover-up? Why? Disinformation? Why?

 > Why do we have to deal with this crap here on the UpDates list?

 > Why do we still have to deal and seriously discuss Boylan's
 > findings about the Vatican, when Eduardo proved that it was
 > nothing more than BS? (and that was a good one, Eduardo - carry
 > on!)  Why do we have to discuss the 'Face on Mars' when there
 > obviously is _no_ face?

 Hear, Hear.

 > Are there any more news regarding Roswell (Kevin, where are
 >you?!)?

Yes, but it's bad. Glenn Dennis invented his nurse, and probably
had nothing to do with the case.

J. Bond Johnson is now billing himself as the "Roswell
Photographer" though he only photographed the remains of a
balloon in General Ramey's office. He is denying that he told me
that Ramey told him it was a balloon. He is denying that he said
that he wrote the story in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, which he
told me. It's all on tape. Even after hearing the tapes, he
denies it.

Jim Ragsdale so changed his story that he is useless as a witness
to anything. He sold out for money. He signed to mutually
exclusive affidavits.

The case has become so confused by so many people with their own
agendas that it is becoming difficult to sort the truth from the
fiction. Some see it as a way of making money, some see it as a
way of gaining the spotlight, and some see it as a danger to
their own belief structures. We have the Air Force issuing
multiple final reports, some with conclusions so ridiculous that
even the news media was rejecting them.

But, when all is said in done, we have every member of Colonel
Blanchard's staff who was alive to talk to us telling us that
what was recovered was not a balloon. Patrick Saunders wrote on
the flyleaf to

[Seems Kevin stopped keying here... -- ebk]

Let's just say I was AOLed] to finish...

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE UFO CRASH AT ROSWELL "Here is
the truth and I haven't told anybody anything." In other words,
a man in a position to know, who had no motivation at all, was
suggesting that there had been a UFO crash at Roswell.

I should also mention Edwin Easley who said the same sort
of thing as did others.

And where did this idea that there were no ground based radars
at Roswell come from? Yeah, they traveled around practicing
radar bombing at various locations, but that doesn't mean that
such facilities didn't exist in Roswell. They finally got their
Ground Controlled Approach system working in August which
means the radars were in place before then.

Oh well.

KRandle