From: Asgeir Waehre Skavhaug <KONAWS@statoil.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 13:54:16 +0100 Fwd Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 09:25:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Comments on Maccabee's Analysis; Mexico City >Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:22:39 -0400 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >From: David Furlotte <furry@nobelmed.com> >Subject: Re: Comments on Maccabee's Analysis; Mexico City Disc >>Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 19:26:20 -0400 >>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com> >>Subject: UFO UpDate: Comments on Maccabee's Analysis; Mexico City Disc >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>I must comment on this message since evidence has been in the >>video which suggests a video hoax. Some of that evidence is >>directly illustrated in the attached GIF image of four frames >>from the video. In two of the frames, one above the other, on >>the right side there are building images which are sharp. In two Hi List, Quick question on the videographic "evidence" and the resultant "investigation" of such. Blurring as in Soft focus is being maintained as camera shift from being handheld I take it? I concede that this is all too possible however, is it also not Are the procedures for analysis of photographic evidence more or less "standardised"? Could they be smilar to the procedures mentioned, e.g., in this report: - http://www.jse.com/ufo_reports/Sturrock/toc.html (See Appendix 2 here.)
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com