Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Dec -> Re: Abduction of Blacks? [The Finalists]

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Re: Abduction of Blacks? [The Finalists]

From: Greg Sandow <gsandow@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:19:12 -0500
Fwd Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 23:18:43 -0500
Subject: Re: Abduction of Blacks? [The Finalists]


>Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 21:48:37 +0000
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: John Rimmer <magonia@magonia.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Abduction of Blacks? [The Finalists]

>I'm puzzled as to why the phrase "concern over alien
>immigration" is considered "degrading" to Americans, or why it
>should need an apology. This is typical of so much of the
>reaction to psychosocial arguments (and, in fairness, most other
>arguments) on the Internet.

I can't speak for others on the list, but I have a different
problem with the phrase "concern over alien immigration."
Obviously there's "concern over alien immgigration" in the
United States. There's also concern over crime, air pollution,
natural foods, the price of auto insurance, the decline of news
reporting into gossip mongering, the inability of TV networks to
find viewers for new shows, and (in New York) the apparent
inability of the Metropolitan Transit Authority to use its
unexpected financial surplus to increase the quality and
frequency of subway trains.

All these themes sail somewhat randomly through the media. Often
they're contradictory. If you simply want to observe American
life, the spectacle can be both provocative and entertaining.

But if you want to study some aspect of American life more
seriously -- the abduction phenomenon, for instance -- you have
to be much more precise about what you say. Do you want to link
abductions to the evident "concern" over immigration? You then
have to establish actual facts about that "concern," beyond the
mere fact of its existence. How strong is the "concern"? How
many people share it? Who are those people? Are they the same
people who appear to be involved in the abduction phenomenon?

You have to establish that the "concern" about immigration
somehow stands out from other "concerns," either in American
life in general, or among people involved with abductions. Some
people asserting the connection between abductions and
immigration -- like the writer of the document Peter Brookesmith
posted -- try to do this by saying that the reaction to
immigration reaches the level of "panic." This, however, is open
to serious question. Nor do those making this claim help their
case by failing to provide any evidence beyond a few anecdotes.

What happens when the claim of immigration "panic" is
challenged? One response seems to be a retreat from "panic" to
"concern." If people like me object to the description of a
"panic," surely we'll admit that there's a "concern."

Well, of course there is, but what does that prove? As I said,
there are "concerns" in America (and elsewhere0 about endless
numbers of things. If the mere existence of a "concern" about
immigration is enough to connect fear of immigration to
abductions, then the connection becomes untestable. It's going
to be a long time before any of us will be able to look at
American life, and not see some upset, somewhere, over
immigration. Are the supporters of this immgration-abduction
hypothesis going to say that as long as someone, somewhere is
upset about immigration the hypothesis remains viable? If they
do say this, then the hypothesis can never be falsified.

In order for me, at least, to take it seriously, I need it
formulated in scientific terms. I need a way to measure how
intense and how widespread the "concern" over immigration is.
Once that's accomplished, I need to know how high the measured
"concern":needs to be before it can be put forth as an
explanation for other developments. I need testable hypotheses
that flow from the theory. If abduction fear is really
influenced by immigration fear, what other developments would we
expect to see? What developments ought to be ruled out?

Without these scientific refinements, the theory remains just an
idle assertion.

Greg Sandow


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.


[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.