Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Dec -> Re: Insight On The Fox Special and Kiviat

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:58:55 -0400
Fwd Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:22:34 -0500
Subject: Re: Insight On The Fox Special and Kiviat



>Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 23:16:32 -0800
>From: Don Ecker <decker@ufomag.com>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Insight On The Fox Special and Kiviat

>OK, another viewpoint on Kiviat and the Alien Autopsy

>By
>Don Ecker
>*********************************************

>>Kiviat, who says he always doubted the truth of the alien
>>autopsy, describes his specials as having "a documentary spin."

>Ok, and now for my final word on the above;

>Bull Shit.

>Regards;

>Don Ecker
>UFO Magazine


I too had dealings with Kiviat who was consistently over
enthusiastic and had little concern with the truth about the
"autopsy " footage.and was unwilling to pay for services
rendered. He told Billy Cox a fine and very knowledgeable
journalist for Florida Today that he wanted him to check things
out.. no money of course.

Billy's first thought was to investigate Santilli. Horrors. no
way. Just about everything Santilli told me in our first
conversation turned out to be a lie.

Kiviat's people spent 4 hours with Bruce Maccabee and 3 hours
with me down in DC. Kiviat used none of Bruce's analysis and
used 30 seconds of my comments out of context.. He  very much
distorted the meaning of the experts.. partly by telling them
that the film had been dated by Kodak to 1947..

Look at that terrible segment with the detective who was to find
the cameraman. UGH . Not to be trusted.

Stan Friedman