From: "Larry Hatch" <larryhat@jps.net> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 01:30:07 -0800 Fwd Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 09:59:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Project 1947: DAY/NIGHT - More *U* Findings >Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:23:46 -0800 (PST) >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@proaxis.com> >Subject: Re: Project 1947: DAY/NIGHT - More *U* Findings >>>>[....] >>>> I have no ready explanation for the steady drop >>>> in the ratio of day sightings since 1940, and >>>> invite discussion. > Alright, it's time to mention the possible explanation that > remains unspoken until now. Since, according to a recent > poll, more Americans think that UFO aliens are more > intelligent than we are, by and large, than those who think > they're less intelligent, the following explanation needs to > be included: > It's in accordance with the aliens' own planning. > The aliens in charge wished to get us up to speed > on [their] craft ..relatively quickly -- to the point where > some 50% of the population would realize it was > occurring for real. So they could at first permit a lot > of daytime sightings in so doing. > But they didn't wish to suddenly escalate that up to > 80 or 90%, because that would quickly snowball to > 100% whereupon even science, the open government > and the conservative news media would then realize > the alien presence. .. extreme panic and chaos .. > would ... suddenly be upon us. > Instead the aliens wished to extend the 50% belief > level for a couple generations .. to get used to it all, > discuss it, hash it out, etc., [ snip ] > .. by then our sciences, especially astronomy, would > have advanced enough to allow the idea of habitable > alien planets within the galaxy/universe to become > plausible and commonplace .. they couldn't continue > with so many daytime sightings. <big snip> > .. nighttime [sightings] would keep the subject in > people's minds without causing the belief level to soar > past 50%. <snip> > Why leave alien intelligence out of the picture? > Jim Deardorff Jim: I certainly did not intend to leave alien intelligence out of the picture, and your interpretation is as good as any I have heard .. including some which hold that the nearly 3-to-1 shift ( even greater if we compare the 1940s to subsequent decades) can be attributed entirely to completely earthly effects. I wish there were some statistical way to take the raw figures, and separate objective (i.e. UFO caused) from subjective ( earthly or /observer oriented) influences. I suspect this is impossible, due to the many factors involved. Jan Aldrich has correctly pointed out that there were a lot of surplus blimps (etc.) used for advertising purposes. I cannot rule out the possibility, however, that those responsible for "true" (i.e. completely mysterious) UFOs, have had some change of plan, priority or agenda .. perhaps they indeed decided UFOs were simply being "seen too much". - Larry Hatch.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com