Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Feb -> Here

From: Ufojoe1@aol.com [Joe Murgia]
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 20:34:20 EST
Fwd Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 21:12:09 -0500
Subject: Re: The Real David Morehouse??


>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 12:59:43 -0500
>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
>Subject: UFO UpDate: The Real David Morehouse??
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>


 >>From: "Mark Isganitis" <isganim@enter.net>
 >>To: updates@globalserve.net
 >>Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:26:50 4
 >>Subject: (Fwd) The Real David Morehouse??

 >Hi!

 >>I came across this post on another mail service I belong to
 >>and I thought it might be interesting reading for some of
 >>the folks out there.

 >>I have no knowledge of the accuracy of the information
 >>contained in this post, and cannot represent it as completely
 >>true or factual.  However it may explain some things.


>Thanks for the message. This does jibe with what little I know
>about the subject. Interested to learn that Morehouse's original
>connection with RV did not come as a result of a bullet grazing
>his head during a training exercise in Jordan (which is the claim
>he makes in PSYHIC WARRIOR). I was aware that Marr's book on
>psychic stuff was cancelled. Marrs then turned to UFOS and wrote
>Alien Agenda which was published last year. It has a chapter or
>so on RV.

>There may be something there.... but it seems to me to be  even
>more difficult to separate truth from bovine excretion in RV than
>it is in UFOs.

> CAVEAT EMPTOR!

Bruce,

My wife and I studied Basic Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) with
Lyn Buchanan, and as you said, there's something there. In my
opinion, Lyn is the best teacher in the CRV business. CRV is far
from 100% accurate and was originally developed with feedback
after a session being essential. If there's no feedback, then
technicaly it's not remote viewing. Ingo Swann developed the
protocols (With the help of U.S. Gov't funds) and stressed the
importance of feedback as part of the CRV protocols. Without
feedback, you''ll never know if you're right or not.

Remote viewing Aliens and such is probably a lot of fun but next
to impossible to obtain feedback. Marrs shouldn't have devoted so
much space in his book to this topic. Marrs also made a big deal
about multiple viewers getting the same results with regard to
certain alien targets. Marrs said that this added to the
credibility of the results. Marrs obviously didn't talk to the
most qualified, respected and experienced remote viewers. If he
would have spoken to Joe McMoneagle, Lyn Buchanan or Paul Smith,
he would have been told that if seven viewers get the same
results on a common target and one viewer gets something
completely different, it's just as likely that the one viewer is
right as it is that the seven are right. So as you can see,
mutiple viewers means nada and Marrs should have done his
homework. What the hell was he thinking?

Remote viewing works, it's far from perfect and it needs to be
studied further. It takes A LOT of practice to become a good
viewer. Most people aren't dedicated enough to be successful in
the RV field. At the present time, I'm one of those people.

As far as David Morehouse goes, I won't even waste my time. He
has so many misrepresentations in his book it's not even funny.

Joe Murgia