Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Feb -> Here

From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 21:14:14 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 21:51:47 -0500
Subject: Re: The Real David Morehouse??


>From: Ufojoe1@aol.com [Joe Murgia]
>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 20:34:20 EST
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: The Real David Morehouse??


>>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 12:59:43 -0500
>>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
>>Subject: UFO UpDate: The Real David Morehouse??
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

(SNIP)

>>This does jibe with what little I know
>>about the subject. Interested to learn that Morehouse's original
>>connection with RV did not come as a result of a bullet grazing
>>his head during a training exercise in Jordan (which is the claim
>>he makes in PSYHIC WARRIOR). I was aware that Marr's book on
>>psychic stuff was cancelled. Marrs then turned to UFOS and wrote
>>Alien Agenda which was published last year. It has a chapter or
>>so on RV.

>>There may be something there.... but it seems to me to be  even
>>more difficult to separate truth from bovine excretion in RV than
>>it is in UFOs.

>> CAVEAT EMPTOR!

>My wife and I studied Basic Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) with
>Lyn Buchanan, and as you said, there's something there. In my
>opinion, Lyn is the best teacher in the CRV business. CRV is far
>from 100% accurate and was originally developed with feedback
>after a session being essential. If there's no feedback, then
t>echnicaly it's not remote viewing. Ingo Swann developed the
>protocols (With the help of U.S. Gov't funds) and stressed the
>importance of feedback as part of the CRV protocols. Without
>feedback, you''ll never know if you're right or not.

>Remote viewing Aliens and such is probably a lot of fun but next
>to impossible to obtain feedback. Marrs shouldn't have devoted so
>much space in his book to this topic. Marrs also made a big deal
>about multiple viewers getting the same results with regard to
>certain alien targets. Marrs said that this added to the
>credibility of the results. Marrs obviously didn't talk to the
>most qualified, respected and experienced remote viewers. If he
>would have spoken to Joe McMoneagle, Lyn Buchanan or Paul Smith,
>he would have been told that if seven viewers get the same
>results on a common target and one viewer gets something
>completely different, it's just as likely that the one viewer is
>right as it is that the seven are right. So as you can see,
>mutiple viewers means nada and Marrs should have done his
>homework. What the hell was he thinking?

>Remote viewing works, it's far from perfect and it needs to be
>studied further. It takes A LOT of practice to become a good
>viewer. Most people aren't dedicated enough to be successful in
t>he RV field. At the present time, I'm one of those people.

>As far as David Morehouse goes, I won't even waste my time. He
>has so many misrepresentations in his book it's not even funny.

Thanks for the CC (cogent comments) by Joe Murgia.