From: Michael Christol <mchristo@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 11:10:41 -0600 Fwd Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 14:59:57 -0500 Subject: Re: Archeologists & UFOs >Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 23:24:29 -0400 >From: "Stanton T. Friedman" <fsphys@brunnet.net> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'UFO Sphere/Orb' over Brooklyn, NY >> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 14:58:06 +0000 >> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >> From: u9501676@bournemouth.ac.uk (Simon Cleggett) >> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: 'UFO Sphere/Orb over Brooklyn, NY >Ted Phillips has collected more than 5000 physical trace cases >wherein people saw the saucer on or near the ground and >subsequently the rings or circles were observed. I think there >needs to be a far better definition of what is meant by >circles.. NOT crop circles but not collections of stones either. >Which pictures? >Stan Friedman Oh, by the way Stan... In my previous message to you regarding this topic, I neglected to mention another incident, which left more than just 'trace' elements. A farmer in Western Daviess County, saw a light decend behind the trees on his farm and appear to land. Since it was dark, he did not want to stumble around out there in the dark, so he waited until the next morning. The next morning he surveyed the area where he had seen the object appear to land, and didn't find anything. This was in late winter. When he started his spring plowing, he noticed something interesting in the area where he remembered seeing the light decend into his field. The field was still slightly frozen near the tree and fence line. He walked over to the object and noticed that it was an imprint, pressed and compacted into the mud, of a small disk about three inches in diameter, with a nipple abut two inches long protruding from the bottom of it. Since it was hard and compacted, he picked it and took it home with him and made a plaster cast of the imprint. After it was examined, it looked as though it could have been a "pressure" sensor attatched to the foot of a larger foot pad. In other words, the nipple was the first thing to become imbedded in the soil, followed by the small three inch disk, which supposedly measured the density and integrity of ths soil, so it could be determined if the large landing pad could be supported by the soil. Sure this is all speculation, but, one thing is sure. I have seen the plaster cast of this casting. I have a video copy of it. The thing just "popped" up out of the ground intact when the spring thaw happened. This is the only "evidence" the farmer had to support his sighting. Just another tid bit of history from Space_Link UFO Archives. <G> REgards, Mike
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com