Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Feb -> Here

From: JJ <fierycelt@full-moon.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:00:30 +1030
Fwd Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 23:43:46 -0500
Subject: Re: 'UFO Sphere/Orb' over Brooklyn, NY


> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 06:59:45 -0500 (EST)
> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> From: Steve Neeley <stneeley@mail.bright.net>
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'UFO Sphere/Orb' over Brooklyn, NY


> >>> >As a professional photographer I would like to state categorically
> >>> >that this is a lens flare. Sorry I can only speak to what I see,
> >>> >not any other references to what you saw before or after taking
> >>> the picture.
> >>> >Drew Williamson

> Hi Errol, JJ, and list subscribers,

> I would like to take offense at this UN-scientific and
> obviously biased opinion.

> Jenifer Jarvis is a well-respected and honest skywatcher.


Hi there Steve!!

Thank you kind sir!!!


> She has presented many pics of the "ORBS" and has been
> working with CSETI for several years.

Right now I am working on getting some of this documentation up
on a website, and then interested parties can see for themselves
what it is that I have witnessed.

I am doing occasional "sorties" to the lake, and on January 20th
witnessed 7 submersions (of "orbs")  in a space of 40 minutes. I
am not filming as yet, because my fingers tend to seize up, and
I can't manipulate the camera with gloves on.  Temperatures are
not that bad, but on New Year's Eve, when I saw only ONE "orb,"
just on midnight, the temperature was around   - 20 C.

> My experience with photographing unidentified LITS
> reveal that sometimes even a close-up photo will
> sometimes be blacked out completely. Or will present
> light that looks totally different than that seen with
> naked eye.

I must admit that things seen through the viewfinder sometimes
bear _no_ resemblance to what was seen with the naked eye.  Also,
I find that, on many occasions, I have left the camera "rolling,"
so to speak, and that interesting anomalies have appeared on
replaying the tape.  Things that I _never_ saw with naked eye.

However, this was probably because I was busy chatting with
passers-by or my co-watchers.  :-)

> Skeptical disinformation is not the same as
> scientific proof.

> Steve

I think that, the only thing that we are going to _prove_ is that
there are things around us, above us and below us, about which we
_know_ very little

Very best wishes,

JJ