Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Jan -> Re: 'Alien Autopsy' film 'Danger' sign

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Philip Mantle <el51@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 08:38:34 +0000
Fwd Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 17:44:51 -0500
Subject: Re: 'Alien Autopsy' film 'Danger' sign


> From: RGates8254 <RGates8254@aol.com> [Robert Gates]
> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 20:22:50 EST
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'Alien Autopsy' film 'Danger' sign

> >  Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 07:27:14 +0000
> >  From: Philip Mantle <el51@dial.pipex.com>
> >  To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> >  Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'Alien Autopsy' film 'Danger' sign

> <brevity snip>

> >  Dear Robert,

> >  Not so I'm afraid. If I can prove to myself conclusively enough
> >  that the film is a fraud I will be the first to stand up and
> >  admit I was wrong. I am only human after all and prone to err. As
> >  yet, though, I have not reached this stage.

> >  Philip.

> Dear Philip,

> >From what you said, you are working from the point of view
> that the film is *real* unless proven otherwise.

> I am glad to see that you will be the first one to admit that
> he made an error.

> I am curious about what you standards of *conclusive proof*
> are?

> Cheers,
> Robert

Dear Robert, my opinion as the authenticity or not of this film
has changed several times. Atv the moment I am undecided one way
or the other.

Proof to me could come in many forms. If the film could be
accurately dated and was shown to be of a recent make. If one of
the items in the film was not around in l947, say a wrist watch
(there are none in the film)>  that was post l980, for example.
Or if Ray Santilli or someone else (I doubt if it would be Ray)
would come forward and show us all how they hoaxed it. These are
just a few of the many things that would work for me. What about
you ?

Philip.