Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Jan -> Re: Chilling Video Record of a Family's Abduction

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Steven Kaeser" <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 18:46:04 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 20:00:52 -0500
Subject: Re: Chilling Video Record of a Family's Abduction


>From: XianneKei <XianneKei@aol.com> [Rebecca Keith]
>Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 18:48:38 EST
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Chilling Video Record of a Family's Abduction

>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 08:25:13 -0500
>>  To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>  From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com>
>>  Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Chilling Video Record of a Family's
Abduction

>>  >I'm just glad that we are not having to duke out the validity of
>>  >this video with the true believers.

>>  What in the world makes you so sure of that????  There will
>>  certainly be conspiracy theorists who will say there was a real
>>  abduction but the video vanished and they had to use actors and
>>  do it again.

>>  True believers are just that.

>Bob, do you see many people arguing about the validity of the video?

>I rest my case.

>Rebecca


I don't know if the numbers mean much, but as of 6:30pm (est)  on
Saturday there were

    10,428 votes cast by those who believed the video was real and
    10,501 votes cast by those who believed it to be a fake

Those who have voted for it apparently don't frequent the usuall
"lists" and haven't been engaging in the debate.  If the web
site's poll is to be believed, about half the viewers who have
computers believed it was real. On the other hand, I'm not too
trusting of anything that UPN does or says these days.

Of the three "lists" I monitor, no one has argued for its
validity, and UPN is taking the brunt of the anger (as they
should).

Steve