Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Jul -> Here

From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:52:27 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 17:32:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Philip Mantle 'Signs-off'

>Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 20:32:01 +0200
>From: Bruno Mancusi <Bruno.Mancusi@com.mcnet.ch>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Philip Mantle 'Signs-off'/Santilli's footage


>Now that you are going to resign from ufology, can you say us at
>last what was your real involvement in this "Roswell autopsy"
>story? Why have you accepted to help Ray Santilli to put in
>touch with the ufological milieu? Have you received money from
>him? How much?

>I think that many list members would be interested in your
>response.

>Thank you in advance.

>Bruno Mancusi
>Switzerland

Bruno-

While your questions are valid ones, I don't think you had to
wait for Philip's withdrawal from active research to ask them..
Unfortunately, the questions also seem to assume information
that (in a legal sense) has not been submitted into evidence.

I have seen no evidence that Philip's involvement in this was
anything more than he has acknowledged from the beginning.. His
position at the time with BUFORA would make him a natural
contact as far as Santilli was concerned. Since many in UFOlogy
are willing to accept the validity of evidence until proven
otherwise, his reaction to (and involvement with) Santilli in
this matter was certainly not all that unusual. It's important
to keep in mind that Philip is the one who has submitted some of
the most damning evidence during the past few weeks.

Philip can answer the questions you pose if he feels the need,
but I see no reason to imply improper conduct without more than
speculation to go on.

Steve