Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Mar -> Re: Jim Dilettoso Finally Exposed for Good?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 13:04:15 -0500
Fwd Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 22:27:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Jim Dilettoso Finally Exposed for Good?

>From: Ufojoe1 <Ufojoe1@aol.com> [Joe Murgia]
>Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 17:21:10 EST
>To: updates@globalserve.net


>Subject: Jim Dilettoso Finally Exposed for Good? Korff Says What?
>Also, whatever happens to Village Labs and Dilettoso has nothing
>to do with what actualy happened that night. I could care less
>what the "experts" say because they usually don't know jack. (Not
>Nickelson)


Joe,

I may not agree with Kal on a lot of things, although I find
myself agreeing with him more than with many on this list, but
the important point is that Dilettosa is one of those who doesn't
know Jack.

This has nothing to do with whether the Phoenix lights were a big
UFO or not.

Dilettoso is not an expert on anything photographic, and his work
gets the laughter it deserves when shown in knowledgeable
photographic circles.

Anyone can buy a computer and some software and make "purty
pitchers" with lots of colors and such, generate graphs, and
connect dots.

This makes them an expert at ----- what?????


Bob