Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> May -> Here

From: "Matthews" <matthews@zetnet.co.uk> [Tim Mathews]
Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 01:17:52 +0100
Fwd Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 11:27:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Talking Sense About Flying Triangles


> Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 03:18:20 -0700
> From: Andy Denne <aura.aa@wxs.nl>
> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Talking Sense About Flying Triangles

> > From: "Matthews" <matthews@zetnet.co.uk> [Tim Matthews]
> > To: <updates@globalserve.net>
> > Subject: Urgent - Talking Sense About Flying Triangles
> > Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 02:13:43 +0100

> <snippage>

> > In my forthcoming book I conclude that a similar craft was
> > responsible for the over 5,000 sightings of the boomerang-shaped
> > 'UFO'. If you put powerful lights on the underside of one of
> > these craft it would be easy to confuse ground witnesses.

> Sorry Mr. Matthews, this is no argument to explain the triangular
> UFOs, this is guessing, or have you forgotten the Belgian
> UFO-flap?  These objects DID show on ground and on-board-radar.
> They moved with speeds I sure as hell would like to see performed
> by a LTA vehicle.

> These objects, as you probably know were also caught on video
> preforming some pretty irrational movents for a "sophisticated
> balloon".

> I do agree that especially triangular shapes are often
> misinterpreted as UFOs but with this explanation I get the old
> "it was a weatherballoon" feeling again...

Hello there,

Belgium - read Wim Van Utrechts' articles on the Belgian wave.
The question of the radar evidence is important because it was/is
so flawed. Did you know that there were significant problems with
the radar systems and that the two interceptors sent up locked
onto each other during their mission?

It is said that the pilots did not see the object in question
although they were supposedly near to it.

Ground observers present a particularly confused picture and why
do the videos taken not show a solid object? I suggest that there
is little correlation between the craft seen moving slowly at low
altitude and the 'craft' or phenomena reportedly operating at
high speed. Perhaps US-UK intelligence interest in the Belgian
sightings was more a case of their keeping an eye on their own
prototype rather than concern about aliens.

Alternatively, if we discounted the radar evidence it would still
be possible for electrogravitics systems to produce such
maneuvers IF you accept that these systems have gone beyond the
somewhat theoretical stage as noted in several 1950s reports, one
of which entitled 'Electrogravitics Systems' (Gravity Research
Group, London, 1956) states that an operating system would enable
an aircraft to perform sharp-edged changes of direction typical
of motion in space.

The report postulated a flying saucer as the basis of a Mach 3
interceptor and noted that such technological developments could
only be undertaken if a 'Manhattan-District-type effort' was put
in place....

You never know, maybe there were two different types of UFOs
operating? I don't necessarily believe this but it must be worth
considering.

In any case, these triangles seem to me, and others who tend to
avoid these UFO sites, to be little more than modern-day flying
wings. After all, the Horten Brothers developed boomerang-shaped
aircraft back in the 1930s and Alexander Lippisch developed a
number of aircraft utilizing triangular planforms including a
supersonic delta wing concept.....

(I can send you the Electrogravitics report free if necessary.
Send me an an address in Holland.)

The truth is that British Aerospace and others have been working
on similar propulsion systems for years and it is likely that
these are advanced beyond our imagination.

This has little to do with alien technology.

Read 'Night Siege' by Imbrogno or Tony Gonsalves report into the
Hudson Valley UFO flap. Boomerang-shaped aircraft with lights on
the underside. A military UFO that reportedly left Philip Klass
grasping for a solution........The UFO in question travelled
slowly, did not perform staggering changes of direction etc. Even
ground observers suspected that this was a type of blimp - albeit
an advanced one.

I have spoken to several witnesses who state that the craft they
saw most closely resembled the B2 'stealth' bomber..........

This is the painful truth........

They've been flying their toys for 50 years and we have provided
them with the perfect cover - ET spacecraft.........

Now which respected Ufologist suggested in 1981 that UFOs were
controlled not by an intelligence but by an intelligence agency?

Answers on a postcard please!

Tim M.

----------