Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> May -> Here

From: "Serge Salvaille" <sergesa@connectmmic.net>
Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 11:50:13 +0600
Fwd Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 15:01:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Talking Sense About Flying Triangles

>From: UFOLAWYER1 <UFOLAWYER1@aol.com> [Peter Gersten]
>Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 18:38:26 EDT
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Talking Sense About Flying Triangles

>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: "Serge Salvaille" <sergesa@connectmmic.net>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Talking Sense About Flying Triangles
>>Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 15:03:44 +0600

>>>From: "Matthews" <matthews@zetnet.co.uk> [Tim Matthews]
>>>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
>>>Subject: Urgent - Talking Sense About Flying Triangles
>>>Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 02:13:43 +0100

>Actually I believe Tim is referring to the
>triangular/v-shaped/boomerang/delta UFO which came into
>prominence in the 80s and is still being seen in the 90s. It
>would appear that given two inferences to draw from the evidence,
>one terrestrial and the other extraterrestrial...we should draw
>the more logical terrestrial explanation...at least until proven
>otherwise. At the present time the evidence suggests either an
>unusual type of military aircraft and/or the mis-identification
>of a group 5-9 small planes flying in unusual formations to
>either deceive the public or provide a smokescreen for the delta
>shaped aircraft....usually seen in the general vicinity.


Peter,

Tim wrote the following:

>>In addition to this we have several declassified studies from the
>>1950s stating that a flying saucer might form the basis of an
>>interceptor aircraft based upon electrostatic propulsion. That
>>was then and no doubt they had problems. What about now 40 years
>>later given billions of dollars of secret funding and the
>>opportunity for scientists to develop new technologies without
>>the usual restraints?

>>I must conclude that given this information, which is but a
>>fraction of the overall evidence, that there is NO evidence that
>>either flying saucers or flying triangles are of ET origin. In
>>any case, both types are for use WITHIN an atmosphere.

That is why I wrote my post: looked to me as an acute case of
over-generalization. Some UFOs must be misinterpreted secret
military aircrafts, but not ALL the UFOs. And I fail to see the
soundness of taking a ride in the park with a multi-million $
gadget just to make tests in psychological warfare.

Please read Tim's post entirely.