From: "David Baker" <davbak@globalnet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 20:45:18 +0100 Fwd Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 21:04:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Time to retire 'Ufologist', 'Ufology' >Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 12:39:55 -0400 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Time to retire 'Ufologist', 'Ufology' >>From: SGB List 2 <SGBList2@aol.com> >>Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 02:52:42 EDT >>To: updates@globalserve.net >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Time to retire 'UFOlogist', 'UFOlogy' >>The extraterrestrial origin of some craft in our midst has been >>proven for some time. What is at issue now is the inability of >>individuals to accept the verdict based on the level of >>resistance they possess to the implications. >Hogwash! Nothing about origins has been proved! We don't even >have proof we are dealing with solid objects! >Bob I can't really understand all the wailing and gnashing of teeth concerning the term 'ufologist'....as many have said, it's a term that has settled into the conciousness of the masses for far too long to change now, and surely it's as good a term as any. But "UFO Community"....now there IS a bad term. Oh, and how about "UFO Buffs"? "Ufologist" just pales into inconsequence now, huh?
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com