Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Nov -> Re: Planet Discovered 35 Light Years From Earth

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 08:53:13 -0400
Fwd Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 12:40:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Planet Discovered 35 Light Years From Earth


>Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 15:24:28 +0100
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Christophe Meessen <meessen@cppm.in2p3.fr>
>Subject: Re: Planet Discovered 35 Light Years From Earth

>Hello,

>>Sorry, but Terry Dickinson and I both looked at Joachim's work
>>years ago and found it not to have merit for a bunch of reasons.

>>The portrayal above of the conversation with the alien is
>>fictional.

>It was based on the reading of Joachim's document. I have no
>access to Fuller's book here.

>You made a point, I should check it before spreading this
>information any further.

>But your argument saying you and other guys checked it and
>concluded the theory had to be rejected does not impress me by
>itself. I would like to hear some more substantial arguments
>explainign _why_ you concluded that the theory proposed by
>Joachim does not hold. Like planets position not matching the
>map, etc.

>I also want to make clear that the point in question is : does
>the map represent our solar system at a given date in 1961 ? We
>are not considering the question where the map comes from, etc.
>This question should be easy to answer, no ?

>>Try looking at the ZRI booklet or better yet 'The Interrupted
>>Journey' by John Fuller. Marge Fish's work had also been
>>carefully considered and passes muster.

>Could you give me the URL to this information ?

>I'm also interested in the fuller's book An Interupted Journey.
>Is this book still available ?

>Maybe we can keep this discussion of the list if you prefer.

>Bien cordialement,

>Ch.Meessen


There is a new edition of two books-in-one by John G. Fuller -
'Incident at Exeter' and the 'Interrupted Journey'.

Both are worth reading. I doubt very much if the Zeta Reticuli
stuff is on the web. Beautiful color. I have the world supply of
the 32page full color reprint from Astronomy Magazine..
including Dickinson's original article and about 9 more letters
including 2 from Carl Sagan.. Really neat.

I don't like to simplify our analysis of Koch's work. Frankly
there were so many baseless assumptions and distortions that
after a while we gave up.

The Update I mentioned deals with a number of objections. It is
interesting that everybody who attacked Marge's work
misrepresented what she did.

Stan Friedman