Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Nov -> Here

From: Michael Christol <mchristo@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 13:34:24 -0600
Fwd Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 18:40:49 -0500
Subject: Re: When SETI Gets An ET Signal!


>Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 01:08:36 -0800
>From: Larry Hatch <larryhat@jps.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: When SETI Gets An ET Signal!


>I think that the recent SETI hoax from Britain set back the SETI
>effort back by approx. three years and nine months. (subjective
>estimate.)

>Four years at the most, and probably less. Big deal.

>One or two Adamskii's can harm UFO studies more than that.


Larry, I would not be so quick to judge Adamski.

To the best of my knowledge, Adamski's photos and films have not
been proven to be fakes, regardless of what the Debunkers would
have you believe.

Why do we automatically accept the idea of Universal Life, some
capable of possibly sending and receiving radio and other types
of signals into space for US to receive at some point...

Some capable of Interstellar and Interspacial travel to this
planet...

And then, when someone comes along and says that they actually
had such an experience, we automatically jump on the debunkers
boat and say "they are a fake". They can do more to harm ufology
than SETI setbacks.

This is precisesly the viewpoint which Major Donald Keyhoe took
as head of NICAP.

He believed that UFOs/Flying Saucers were real, but did not
believe that they had "living beings" as pilots.

Give me a break...You can't have it both ways. Either they are
or they are not.

If UFO/FLYING SAUCERS are real, then they must be piloted at
some point.  Possibly some are/were remote controlled craft, but
at some point they must be piloted!!!!

IF we can't accept that thought, then we have no business
persuing this field of thought much less commenting on it.

I personally take the point of view that: The Multiverse is
Inhabited by Innumerable Life Forms of various stages of
Evolution; physically, mentally, spiritually.  How many are
beyond us?  Who knows...but in my opinion, some or many are. Who
am I to define their capabilities? I can't even drive a car
which does not have wheels.  I am still earth bound. Yet, I and
others like me sometimes make statments which show our lack of
objective understanding in the broad view of this phenomena.

REgards, Mike, the Un-Expert....

ICQ#:7508455.
(502) 683-6811