UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: "Gt Mccoy" <gtmccoy@harborside.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 22:02:05 -0700 Fwd Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 22:31:17 -0400 Subject: Re: The Lunar Conspiracy >From: Jim Mortellaro Jsmortell@aol.com >Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 21:33:20 EDT >To: updates@globalserve.net >Subject: The Lunar Conspiracy >I would like very much to open a thread on a subject that, since >I have been here, which is not very long albeit, I have not seen >addressed. The subject is our moon. >There are a number of issues which I have read lately, >attempting to give ground to theories on the condition of this, >our nearest neighbor in space. >Among these are the following: >- The moon is an artificial satellite No, it is a natural satellite-ask say,Pliny,Tycho,Gallieo,Newton and Copernicus. >- The moon is hollow With Reference to Mr Newton, if the Moon was hollow, how do you expliain tides? Unless the hollow moon was made of say, depleted Uranium. >- We have ceased exploration on the "orders" or "agreement" of > Aliens who would have us stay away from their labors there Not shure about that one,can't really comment.However, it may have somthing to do with national apathy at the time, and Nixon's problems. I remember spacefight as somthing of a joke in Disconia,er the 70's. >These various rationales appear to be conspiratorial in nature >and connote additional damning evidence of governmental >repression. In truth, my interest is not only curiosity, but >stems from research which has been forced upon me by a client. >This research should have nothing at all to do with the >aforementioned theories >However, I have run into some dichotomous information, the >explanation of which may be related to these theories. >Anyone out there have _facts_ which they are willing to share? Just did. >Any and all information would be appreciated. >Jim Okay I didn't mean to be condesending just truthful. Physics is Physics, Orbital mechanics have been around a long time. The mass of the moon is (Partly)calculated by the gravitational pull on the Earth. If the Moon was hollow, it would be different unless the skin of the Moon was very massive-hence my remark abut depleted Uranium. Now, as far as Aliens on the Moon, I do not know, there is so much static out there (infordisinformation). Who really knows the Truth, you can make a case for a cover-up, but is that a conspiracy? or is it that we really _don't_ want to know that the Moon is really infested with Klingons? Or did we cut a deal with whomever? We will not get that answer straight away. I feel that the field of UFO research should base it's foundation on Observation and Testing (somthing which both "believers" and "sceptics" don't do) in other words - Science and the other part of this truth telling, is accurate reporting (also lacking among the faithfull/less) in the media.I don't want to respond to a new thread with a nasty put down or get a fight started, but I think that when we hear of such rumors as facts. facts should count, but when we can't deny a rumor or story dosn't mean it's not true, or more likely, have an element of truth. -GT McCoy
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com