Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Sep -> Re: Can Satellite's Microwaves Cause Crop Circles

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Re: Can Satellite's Microwaves Cause Crop Circles

From: Mark Cashman <mcashman@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 10:33:09 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 08:29:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Can Satellite's Microwaves Cause Crop Circles

>Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 08:35:03 +0200
>From: Jakes Louw <louwje@telkom.co.za>
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Can Satellite's Microwaves Cause Crop Circles?

>Mark, does it then follow that a very large array with "normal" (ie:
>physically acheivable) output in the range you mentioned, that
>can concentrate its output into a very small area effectively
>can increase the resultant radiation at that focus point?

My point was that those energies are not achievable with current
technologies. They are not just an order of magnitude beyond
conventional power plants, they are eleven orders of magnitude
larger. At the least it requires a fusion explosion and would
only be able to be delivered in a pulse.

>How about HAARP bouncing its waves off the concave
>ionosphere? That concave factor would concentrate the
>beam to a point, if the outgoing beam from HAARP was
>set up correctly.

In the model I presented previously, I simply postulated a beam
about 0.1 m on a side from end to end. SPS research postulates a
much larger beam from a larger emitter to a larger collector.
Your suggestion is the focusing of a large beam to a small
point. Obviously focusing can increase the wattage per square m
at the receiving point, but the inverse square law still
operates, and I believe the energy required does not alter. The
implausibility of generating 10^20 W from any generator is at
the crux of the argument, along with the implausibility of
delivering it undetected.

It will take some pretty solid evidence to convince me that
reflection from the ionosphere will have a focusing effect. It
seems to me that, at best, the ionosphere will act as a
relatively flat mirror in regard to microwave beams of any
reasonable diameter. Also, any such beams, as with the
previously mentioned problem, would probably be easily
detectable on radio, television, and by nuclear alert sensors.

------
Mark Cashman, creator of The Temporal Doorway at
http://www.temporaldoorway.com
- Original digital art, writing, and UFO research -
Author of SF novels available at...
http://www.temporaldoorway.com/library.htm
------




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.


[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.