UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Greg St. Pierrre <StrmNut@aol.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 21:37:26 EDT Fwd Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 00:16:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Physical Evidence Dear list, I found the following at: http://cropcircleconnector.com/1998/cherhill98.html ----- It seems to be yet another piece of interesting physical evidence that pictograms are not created by people. >snip< On Friday July 17 1998 I discovered many dead flies in one of the most interesting formations (in my opinion anyway): the tiny random looking Cherhill formation in the field directly below the White Horse. The first time I was in that formation I sat down in one of the little circles. I saw many little black flies, sitting on the standing stems in the centre of the circle. When I looked more carefully, I noticed that they were dead. It amazed me, so I looked closer and noticed the flies were all stuck to the plants with their tongue, as if they had been sucking some fluid out of the plants after which they died. I looked for more and I found them easily; they were all over the formation, but mainly in the standing stems in the circles’ centres and in the circles’ perimeters. There was another interesting feature: most of the flies had stretched their legs and wings as if they died in chock. Furthermore I found flies that seem to be blown up: they were totally dried out and torn apart. Almost like a variation on blown nodes: blown flies... Were they killed when the formation was actually formed? Moreover I discovered some flies that were still alive but obviously dying; their tongues were also stuck to the plants and in some cases I managed to pull them off the plants. They stayed on my hand as if drugged, but recovered after about ten minutes and flied away. Some flies were dying but so very stuck to the plants that I could’t pull them off the plants without ripping their tongues out, so I left them there. I really don’t know what to think of all this. The flies only appeared in the formation, not outside, except in places where there was a lot of wind damage and where new details had been added later to the formation. (We’have visited the formation several times now and more details keep popping up; the energies seemed to have touched most of the field). We also found dead flies in the Seven Blade formation at Stockbridge and the Double Pentagram north of Oxford. The characteristics were the same: we found them only in the formation, mainly on standing stems and in the perimeter. I walked through the tramlines for miles, up and down the fields, to see if the flies could be found outside the formation also, but in vain, which makes it hard to believe it’s just pesticides that caused this, unless maybe the energies did something really strong with the pesticides. What caused it I don’t know. Did this happen to give us a new lead? Or was it always part of the formations and were we just never really perceptive? I took many samples that will be sent to Dr. Levengood and to a Dutch lab. Naturally as soon as something comes out of that research, it’ll directly appear on the Connector.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com