UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Leanne Martin <leanne_martin@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 19:06:14 PDT Fwd Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 02:40:49 -0400 Subject: Re: Mexico City Footage - Reply From VideoMeister Dear List, I received the following error message when I tried to email a reply VideoMeister. He/She had emailed me with a response to my query on the vertical/horizontal grid of CCD receptors in a video camera that may account for some image anomoly. His/Her message to me is printed below the error message and appears of interest to people. It does, however make me ask, still, whether the possibly relatively motionless (to the CCD) image of the UFO should have shown any smear at all (sorry- graphics just isn't my thing). Is anyone able to confirm a correct email address for the VideoMeister? ****************************************************** Error message to email reply:- Message-id: <19980908014700.15981.qmail@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 18:46:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Leanne Martin <leanne_martin@hotmail.com> To: JSAINIO@QGRAPH.COM Subject: Re: Mexico City UFO Footage Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: Recipient address: JSAINIO@QGRAPH.COM Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address Diagnostic code: smtp; 553 5.7.1 you are not allowed to use this address: JSAINIO@QGRAPH.COM Remote system: dns; racerx.qgraph.com (TCP|206.158.124.5|1180|161.49.28.200|25) (racerx.qgraph.com -- Server ESMTP [PMDF V5.1-10 #24057]) (racerx.qgraph.com) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 20:03:50 -0600 (CST) From: HiSpeedVideoMeister beep 838-7647 <JSAINIO@qgraph.com> Subject: Re: Mexico City UFO Footage Cc: leanne_martin@hotmail.com, brumac@compuserve.com ****************************************************** VideoMeister Message:- Your concern about the relative edge sharpness of the UFO and buildings is a good point. To control for this, I checked against both the nearby building and a far one (with the triangular shape). The UFO edge sharpness is intermediate between the nearby and far buildings. Both buildings showed motion-smearing; the far one showed more, as expected from theory. (The reason is complicated, having to do with stochastic noise, digitizing, and thresholds.) So I eliminated edge-contrast as a possibility for creating the UFO lack of smearing.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com