Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1998 -> Sep -> Re: Symbols Discovered on Roswell Crash Photo

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 10:04:01 EDT
Fwd Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 10:52:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Symbols Discovered on Roswell Crash Photo


>Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 15:18:03 -0500 (CDT)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
>Subject: Re: Symbols Discovered on Roswell Crash Photo

>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
>>Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 22:11:47 EDT
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Re: Symbols Discovered on Roswell Crash Photo


<snip>

>When I said Marcel had never mentioned bodies, he hadn't, as far
>as I was aware. The reference you cite is relatively new, and I
>thank you for drawing it to my attention. It still strikes me as
>odd, given the number of times that he was interviewed, that he
>wouldn't have mentioned bodies, given that they would have
>substantiated his claims that the debris he also saw was not of
>the earth.

It is odd that he didn't mention the bodies to anyone, as far as
I know, other than cousin Nelson. I don't know the relation or
anything else. Personally, I find the account to be dubious, but
then, it is out there.

>My slice of military "experience" was not meant to suggest that
>Marcel could have never been bypassed. I simply don't see how he
>could not have known, given everything that you have going on at
>the base prior to the second recovery, i.e., base alert, a
>massive recovery of material, autopsies of bodies and so on.

>I'm not a military man, but if all this were going on, I think
>the painter would have been escorted off base, especially if it
>were on alert, until things cooled down. And why was he working
>on the July 4th weekend, anyway?

I would expect Marcel to know as well... However, I have also
seen how these things sometimes work. And I have seen people who
are aware of a situation pretending they don't because they are
not authorized to know.

I don't know why the painter was working on July 4. As for being
escorted off the base when things began to pop, it could be as
simple as someone failing to do it until it was too late. But
remember, as I have pointed out, the story about the painter is
not first hand, so there could be other facts to learn.

>As for the fire department, you say you saw records that
>indicated they went outside the city limits in 1947. I may as
>well ask the obvious: did the records indicate a fire outside
>the city on the date Frankie Rowe indicated, or were those
>records missing?

Not only saw, but have copies. At the time in question, the only
run outside the city limits was on June 21, 1947. There is no
record of a run on either July 2 or July 4. However, Dan Dwyer,
Frankie's father was working on July 4 because he was the
officer in charge of a couple of runs.

Now, there is one curious fact here. According to the fire
department records, Dan Dwyer didn't begin working there until
1948, even though he is the one who filled out the log.

>Someone who presumably didn't stumble across the bodies was
>Joseph Montoya, the Lt. Governor. Are we to assume that Marcel,
>the base intelligence officer, had no need to know about the
>recovered saucer and bodies from the first site, but that
>Montoya did?

Now we move in from military personnel to high ranking local
(New Mexican) politicians. Now we have to speculated as to how
Montoya came into contact with this. It might all spin around
Montoya being an important New Mexican politician that allowed
him on the base to blunder into the situation. Again, I simple
don't have all the answers here. I still have lots of questions.

>You're right, Kevin, I don't know how the military mind works.

>As for Blanchard, there are press releases and PRESS RELEASES, I
>think you would grant. Obviously, he wouldn't have consulted
>higher headquarters before announcing a 4th of July picnic. The
>point is that it's hard to imagine how, after having seen the
>material Marcel had in hand, and presumably debriefing him, he
>issued the specific release that he did.
>That's all.

I confess that I'm confused about it as well because it provides
the necessary sign post. But I'm also confused about the nature
of the press release even if it referred to a weather balloon.
The recovery of a weather balloon is not news in any way, yet we
have Blanchard out there announcing it to the world in such a
way as to draw attention to Roswell.

Walter Haut has said that it was done because Blanchard was
attempting to maintain good relations with the town, but I find
that inadequate. He has also suggested that it was part of the
cover story, designed to end the rumors and the talk. Without
Blanchard around to ask, all we can do is speculate about his
motives.

KRandle