Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Aug -> Re: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: David Rudiak <DRudiak@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 20:57:16 EDT
Fwd Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 15:10:00 -0400
Subject: Re: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found


 >From: Kutovoy, Anatoly <kutovoj@MAIL.IAE.LT>
 >Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 08:09:58 +0200
 >Fwd Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:08:22 -0400
 >Subject: C-E: Hubble Moon Photos Found


 >NASA Lied Again - Hubble Moon Photos Found

 >http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/14/pr-photos.html

 >The Space Telescope Science Institute (STSI) released pictures
 >of a celestial object that most people thought the Hubble
 >telescope was not allowed to view: our own Moon. - Sky and
 >Telescope Magazine. Many People have requested NASA to cause the
 >Hubble Space Telescope to be pointed towards the Moon and send
 >back high resolution pictures of any or all of the alleged
 >Apollo Lunar landing sites showing any equipment left behind
 >such as the LEM pads, or anything large enough to be spotted by
 >the HST at an average distance of perhaps 1.28 billion feet,
 >which is an average of about 15,400,000,000 inches distance from
 >Earth. NASA objected stating, "the Moon is too bright", commonly
 >followed-up by, "the Hubble can't focus on something that close"
 >[250,000 miles?]. We knew that this was a lie since the HST has
 >sufficient resolution to return exquisitely clear images of the
 >Lunar landscape. Positive evidence has turned up that indeed
 >NASA & Co. have been lying all along about this Moon is too
 >bright/too close balderdash. I'd just like to say... See?... I
 >told you so. - Bible Thumper

 >HEY NASA! Now that we know you CAN do it... how about taking
 >high resolution close up photos using the Hubble Telescope of
 >the following alleged Apollo landing locations on the Lunar
 >surface: Mare Tranquillitatis 0.67N - 23.49E, Oceanus
 >Procellarum 3.20S - 23.38W, Fra Mauro 3.67S - 17.47W, Hadley
 >Rille 26.10N - 3.65E, Descartes 8.99S - 15.51E, Taurus-Littrow
 >20.16N - 30.76E

 >What lie will NASA tell now?

They aren't lying about not being able to resolve lunar landing
sites with Hubble.  I suggest you read your own referenced
Website:

http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/14/pr-photos.html

Note the part near the bottom which reads:

(lower right) A close-up view of Copernicus' terraced walls.
Hubble can resolve features as small as 280 feet across.

280 feet is a bit larger than a LEM, much less a LEM pad, no?
Can Hubble do better than this?  Not according to basic optical
physics.  A mirror about 2 meters across imaging something
220,000 miles away in blue light (which would give maximum
resolution), can only barely resolve features about 280 feet
across.

Sorry, that's just the way it is.  No lies by NASA here.


David Rudiak