Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Aug -> Here

From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:53:50 -0400
Fwd Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 20:09:26 -0400
Subject: Re: Abductions: A Funny Thing Happened...

 >Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 20:30:36 -0500
 >To: updates@globalserve.net
 >From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
 >Subject: Abductions: A Funny Thing Happened...

 >Abductions: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Millennium

 >List,

 >One aspect of the UFO phenomenon I occasionally think about (to
 >the chagrin of some) is the abduction angle.

Hi Dennis,

Abduction "angle"(?) Your choice of words is something I always
pay attention to Sasquatch. Do you?

Actually, I am not 'chagrinned' at all. There's an awful lot to
be said for the infrequency of your visits to the subject of UFO
abduction. :)

I also have tickets to hear a dissertation on theoretical
physics that is being given by Sylvester Stallone. <lol>

<snip>

 >So how is it, given these two highways headed in apparently
 >opposite directions, that we can claim more close encounters
 >than ever with little corroborating evidence to back it up, when
 >our sensors have multiplied many times over?

Dennis, those "sensors" that you mention are mostly the property
of the very folks being blamed for the cover-up! Proliferation
of detection technology aside, it's very expensive stuff to own
and operate. Excluding FAA/ground control radars I'll wager that
the rest of that sophisticated equipment belongs to military,
NASA, and intelligence operations.

Just how much "public access" do you assume we have to such
data? I wouldn't be at all surprised to find the -actual- radar
data (re: UFOs) that has been kept hidden over the years (for
reasons of "National security") to multiply by 100 fold should
such records ever enter the public domain.

They don't ever tell us spit Dennis. Unless we all gang up on
'em and demand it. Getting any information out of those guys is
just like pulling teeth. Much less any data that would be of a
'sensitive' nature/subject.

Catch 22. Why would the guys who are trying to keep it a "gray
area" (pun intended) have been releasing the very scientific
proof that we would need to prove it all along? You assume we
would automatically know if such data existed. That's naive.

 >Read between the lines (MJ-12's job must be getting harder by
 >the minute, requiring a vast infusion of personnel to maintain
 >the coverup, etc).

All you would have to do to recruit people who would be loyal
and maintain security would be to convince them that they would
be making their sacrifice for the benefit of all mankind. Appeal
to their love of family, and country/patriotism. Would probably
be easy for them to recruit a lot of basically good people
thatta way.

If you don't think it's possible to maintain secrecy/security
while simultaneously maintaining a large and diverse workforce,
just reread your Oppenheimer/Manhattan Project histories. It's
not only do-able, it's been done. And quite successfully too I
might add.  :)

BTW, don't hold your breath waiting for Uncle Sham to release
any recon data it may possess on UFOs, (that it may have
acquired via it's own detection equipment! ) You'd be dead and
blue long before that happens. <Hee-Haw>)

Peace,

John Velez

________________________________________________
                                  jvif@spacelab.net
                     ABDUCTION INFORMATION CENTER
                             http://www.if-aic.com/
  "Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind."
________________________________________________