UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 09:08:50 EST
Fwd Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 20:16:03 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ12 - A Request to Stanton Friedman
>From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: MJ12 - A Request to Stanton Friedman
>Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 23:11:41 -0400
>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
>>Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 08:22:20 EST
>>Subject: Re: MJ12 - A Request to Stanton Friedman
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
<snip>
>My point was not so much that Saucer Smear is a gossip sheet,
>but that somebody asking questions about me and Bill Moore and
>MJ-12 should have given some indication that he has reviewed my
>very extensive writings... which are listed in the snip.
Okay, Stan, fair enough.
<snip>
>I didn't say I had any of the other documents using TOP SECRET
>RESTRICTED.
>Read my comments again.
>Here is a direct quote from page 80 of the GAO's 450 page
>overview of what they did for Steve Schiff:
>DATE: December 7, 1994
>Ms. Laura Jackson and I reviewed records pertaining to the Air
>Force Atomic energy projects and certain mission and weapons
>requirements. These files were classified up to and including
>top secret. The period covered by these records was from 1948
>to 1956. There was no mention of the Roswell Incident. No
>information pertaining to the assignment was obtained. In
>several instances we noticed the classification Top Secret
>Restricted, used on several documents. This is mentioned
>because in past references to this classification (Majestic
>12) we were told that it was not used during this period.
>It would certainly appear that these were documents that had not
>been declassified and are not available to you or me.
>I have no problem in believing that the GAO personnel are
>telling the truth. Do you?
Of course not. However, there is the possibility that they have
made a mistake. That is why it would be nice to see some of these
documents that they mentioned. That would resolve this aspect of
the question.
>It would seem extremely unlikely that a forger would use an
>unusual security marking bound to raise eyebrows.
It was also seem unlikely that a forger of great works of art
would sing his own name to them somewhere but that has
happened.
<snip>
>I will also enclose a listing of items available from UFORI
>including the "Zeta Reticuli Incident" by Terence Dickinson and
>"Update on The Zeta Reticuli Incident". These seem to have been
>left out of your discussion about the Betty Hill star map in
>your "The Abduction Enigma".
Irrelevant to the current discussion of MJ-12.
KRandle
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com