Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Dec -> Re: Alien Autopsy

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Keith Woodard <qwoodard@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 02:10:06 -0800
Fwd Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 08:46:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy


 >Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:42:38 -0600
 >From: Roger Annette Evans <raka@swbell.net>
 >Subject: Alien Autopsy
 >To: updates@sympatico.ca

 >>From: Ed Gehrman
 >>Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 11:42:00 -0800
 >>Fwd Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:43:05 -0500
 >>Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy

<snip>

 >>I realize that Ray's reluctance to offer another
 >>film sample is a serious problem. (He did once
 >>but everyone forgets that.  Kodak dishonestly
 >>protrayed this incident but it's proof, none
 >>the less that Ray did try to have the film verified)

 >Here's the point you don't seem to get, Ed. Ray
 >Santilli has _never_ had a scrap of original film. The
 >only footage he has ever offered for analysis is a
 >dupe or a video tape.

<snip>

I don't understand why so much is made of this point.  As long
as the dupe can be dated to 1947, what difference does it make
that it's not the camera-original film?

Santilli's dupe apparently has the right edge code, and Bob
Shell's dupe is made of acetate propionate.

Bob Shell uses the fact the it's a dupe as an excuse not to
submit it to Kodak, but I can't for the life of me see the logic
of that.