You forgot "www." at the beginning of the server name! You have accessed this page though an incomplete server name: ufomind.com instead of www.ufomind.com --- so some services may not work. Please go to the correct address for this page to make this message go away.

Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Feb -> Here

From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:01:07 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 14:10:59 -0500
Subject: Re: 08-20-96: MJ12 - An Estimate of the Situation


>Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 14:50:15 -0800
>From: Ed Stewart <ufoindex@jps.net>
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: 08-20-96: MJ12 - An Estimate of the Situation

>Another item of mutual "authenticity" and proclaimed as such by
>both Stanton Friedman and the research team of Woods and Woods
>is the SCEO #092447 which is attachment A in the original
>alleged MJ-12 papers and cited in the new alleged MJ-12 papers.

>The following research posted in 1996 after another challenge by
>Stanton Friedman which showed his ignorance and lack of relevant
>research on his part on executive orders should clear any doubt
>on anyone's mind that the document in question is a hoax; and by
>extension, any new alleged MJ-12 document that cites the alleged
>MJ-12 executive order.

>Ed Stewart

>-----

>Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 11:41:04 -0400
>To: ianr@global-data.com
>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ebk@nobelmed.com>
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: MJ-12 Document

>From: egs@netcom.com (Edward G. Stewart)
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: MJ-12 Document
>To: ebk@nobelmed.com (UFO UpDates - Toronto)
>Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 22:12:27 -0700 (PDT)

>>From: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca
>>Date: Sun, 18 Aug 96 00:53:32 -0400

>>The Caus criticism is baseless.

>So proclaims nuclear physicist Stanton T. Friedman. Must be so.
>Then again, maybe not so fast.

<snip>

Is it really so difficult for Ed to notice that there is no
Executive Order or SCEO number on the TF memo?

The only place a number, if one can call it that, appears, is in
a listing in a memo written 5 years later.

As I have previously noted the State Department uses the date in
its filing system. It is convenient.

In the text on page 2 of the EBD it says " by special classified
executive order of President Truman". It Does _not_ say Special
Classified Executive Order or SPECIAL CLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE ORDER
or SCEO 092747.

The criticism fails.

Stan Friedman