Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Feb -> The Sheffield Incident & Things

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Max Burns <AlienHype@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 00:34:41 EST
Fwd Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 09:59:42 -0500
Subject: The Sheffield Incident & Things


Hello good people

Yes you may have noticed that I have been off line for a couple
of months? Moving house / motherboard exploded - just every day
things....

Please replace my old email address:

AlienHype1@Aol.com

with my new address:

AlienHype@Aol.com

And some news will be breaking that is really going to put the
cat among the pigeons, regarding the Sheffield Incident...

Independent information via another researcher, who is going on
the record that he was in the company of, for a few days while
on holiday, with a N.A.T.O. Tornado jet pilot. The pilot has
confirmed 'off-the-record' that the incident over the Peak
District was all the American's fault, and indeed the night's
events culminated in the loss of a N.A.T.O Tornado Jet,
resulting in the death of a pilot...

The co-pilot found wandering on snake pass 1 hour after the
incident. (Jonathan Dagenhart) mini-bus passenger.

Vindicating myself and my research into this incident.

Just to recap on the case, a brief summary of the Sheffield
Incident:

 The nights' events for me began on 24 March 1997 with a
telephone call to my home at about 21.55, from the witness Emma
Maidenhead. During my investigation it has become apparent that
there are eight clear witnesses to the UFO, with a number of
other possible reports contained in the police-log. There were
multiple sonic booms or air explosions occurring at 21.52 and
22.06 and the UFO was tracked on radar in the time frame of
21.55 to 22.05.

The radar track occurred in between the sonic occurrences.

The triangle appears to have been intercepted by the military
jets, as is confirmed by three of the witnesses. A covert low
flying mission taking place at the time was scheduled to be on
the ground at approximately 21.20.

The question must be asked "Why were the jets still in the air
over thirty minutes after they were scheduled to land? This is in
breach of orders, unless of course they were ordered to
intercept the UFO. This would explain why they were in the air
well after they were scheduled to land.

The military still have not admitted to causing the sonic booms
or air explosions, which occurred at 21.52 and 22.06 but the
M.o.D. have changed their version of events on at least four
occasions. Why would a training mission warrant such secrecy and
denials? After all is said and done training missions are pretty
mundane!

The triangle was seen in the area by five, clear, independent
witnesses. Another three witnesses all saw the glowing orange
object moving across the night sky over the town of Dronfield,
the city of Sheffield and the surrounding rural areas.

Three of the witnesses saw the triangle either being escorted or
intercepted by six military jets. Six of the triangle sightings
occurred between 21.45 to 22.15. The weather conditions on that
night were, clear skies with very little cloud cover and only a
light breeze. Therefore the possibility of atmospheric
conditions causing the sonic events must be discounted.

I believe a number of questions need answering.

Were there any other military aircraft over the skies of the UK
on the 24th March 1997? The fact that there were three clear
sightings by members of the public who saw the jets in very
close proximity to the Triangle, almost 30 minutes after they
were scheduled to return, should preclude the answer. Unless in
fact the jets involved in the incident, were involved in a
covert, low flying mission and were told to intercept the
triangle.

The jets were there thirty minutes after they were scheduled to
land why? Were these jets not connected to those on the low
flying training mission? Jets were in the area between 21.45 and
22.00. This coincides with the numerous reports of UFOs that I
have collated over the last sixteen months.

The witnesses are quire clear that what they saw was neither, a
plane or a meteorite. In particular to the report to the police
by Mr Bryan Haslam who reported his sighting of the flying
triangle at 19.40. Although this was two hours before the main
aspects of the incident it should not be discounted, the police
felt it prudent include it in the incident log. His sighting
occurred while it was still just daylight, he was quite clear
about what he saw.

I feel that questions remain unanswered about events over the
Peak District on the 24th March 1997.

The fact that the M.o.D. have changed their version of events on
a number of occasions shows that something is not quite right.
All these changing stories are just not warranted for something
as mundane as a 'training exercise'.

Perhaps most significant is the taped testimony of Mr Jonathan
Dagenhart a member of the RAF, who clearly stated that he
encountered a man on Snake Pass (in the Peak District) about 1
hour after the sonic events or air explosions occurred, who was
"stinking of aviation fuel". This was within a couple of miles of
where the incident occurred. He has since tried to retract his
statement informing me that he "had been spoken to."! When I asked
him to elaborate he stated that he was not allowed to comment
with regard to who had spoken to him.

And some more about the case to follow:

This new information now leads strongly to the motivations and
agenda of those who have sought to have me silenced and would
have preferred it if no one had listened to me. You may know who
they are. You must have seen the 'picture' building, with the
cross-fertilising of posts and the aggression which this well
orchestrated debunking exercise has taken shape against myself
and the case over the last 18 months.

Just thought that I would bring you up to speed, and is me just
saying "Hello", and letting you know that I am still free, as the
Crown have now cancelled my trial on the absurd drug charges for
the third time - with no 're.' date listed.

Obviously this is frustrating for my defence council and myself
as we are keen to see this through the courts and to have my
good name cleared.

Although I cannot discuss the case in detail due to the laws of
prejudice and subjudisy, I can say that there is no forensic
evidence linking myself to exhibit A, e.g. finger-prints.

If I had handled exhibit A, in the contradicting various ways
the police allege - that I have held the item in question - you
would have found my fingerprints or a partial print etc. I am
sure you will not be surprised, in the light of recent
developments, if I tell you that I was not wearing gloves. There
were no gloves in the car, and exhibit A: has not got any
fingerprints on it of any description - no ones.....

I ask that if any of you have any important posts from the last
two months that I may need to see regarding the Sheffield Case
or my investigation into Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or if you
mailed me and I failed to reply, please, resend. I can only
apololgise for the delay.

Watch your mail for the full 'on-the-record' article by a
researcher who will remain, for the time being, name-less. But
who, rest assured, will be going public with what he was told,
regarding the Sheffield Flying triangle incident March 24th
1997.

Debunkers, hard line sceptics and other spOOks, you will have to
wait for this man to reveal himself before you start the attack

Kindest regards,

Max Burns