From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 20:24:29 EST Fwd Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:14:26 -0500 Subject: Re: Robert Todd On MJ-12 >From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: Robert Todd On MJ-12 >Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:32:45 -0400 >>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com> >>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:04:07 EST >>To: updates@globalserve.net >>Subject: Re: Robert Todd On MJ-12 <snip> >I certainly appreciate the calm tone of Kevin's posting. Thank you, Stan. <snip> >Bob Wood's document examiner, Mr. Black, has already >professionally stated that the TF memo typeface is appropriate >for the time frame . That will be published shortly if it hasn't >been already. Did he use a complete strike up of the various typefaces as did the questioned document examiner that you contacted? >Nobody seems to be mentioning that it was TIM GOOD in the UK >that first published the EBD. This could be because Barry Greenwood established that Good had received his copies of the EBD from a "CIA" source who turned out to be Moore. Greenwood did a devastating expose of how he was able to prove that that Good's copy came from Moore. I even talked about it in A History of UFO Crashes. (Hey, everyone else is mentioning their books, so I thought I would join in.) >Bill Moore was indeed given to playing games. That is a far cry >from him and Jaime being professional document forgers. No one said they were professionals. And didn't Moore basically admit that he had "retyped" the Aquarius Telex, added the headings in a cut and paste job, and then admit that the MJ-12 reference wasn't there in the first place? <snip> >I have been told that forgers are normally very very careful to >do nothing that calls their work into question. That is >certainly not the case here. with the unusual Classification, >traceable paper etc Kevin is aware that I have dealt at length >with his objections to the MJ-12 documents in my 37 page, l994, >paper "Operation Majestic 12? YES!". I am pleased that at least >I am not being named as a forger. Even Phil Klass hasn't gone >that far. Certainly aware of the paper but don't buy the arguments. >While most on this list are probably aware that Kevin and I have >had strong differences, they may not be as aware that the >communicatons between Kevin and Don Schmitt and Bill and Jaime >were as I recall much stronger. Please leave me out of that. Schmitt was the one allegedly in contact with Moore and Shandera. As far as I know, I have never spoken to Bill Moore and met Shandera once, in Roswell, in 1997 and we didn't talk about MJ-12 or anything like that. He was busy trying to convince me that J. Bond Johnson hadn't said that Ramey told him, Johnson, that the debris was from a balloon. I didn't buy that argument either. KRandle
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com