You forgot "www." at the beginning of the server name! You have accessed this page though an incomplete server name: ufomind.com instead of www.ufomind.com --- so some services may not work. Please go to the correct address for this page to make this message go away.

Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books New Bookstore Additions (Random Selection) Scientology: A New Slant on Life (new pb) /h/hubbard/ - $6.99 The Selling of the President 1968 (used pb) Joe McGinniss - $3.00 Sybil (used pb) Flora Rheta Schreiber - $3.00 War in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History (2) (used hc) Robert B. Asprey - $8.50 I Can't Believe I Said That (used hc) Gifford - $3.00 Why Can't Men Open Up?: Overcoming Men's Fear of Intimacy (used hc) Steven Naifeh & Gregory White Smith - $4.00   More New Items | Subjects | Main Catalog Page   Thousands of new & used titles, including many you won't find anywhere else! Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Log-In Here For Advanced Features Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jan -> Here Our Focus

From: Serge Salvaille <sergesa@connectmmic.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 13:18:29 -0500
Fwd Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:15:18 -0500
Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche'



>From: Tim Matthews <matthews@zetnet.co.uk>
>To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche'
>Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:38:21 -0000

>>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>>Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:30:17 +0000
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche'

>>>From: Serge Salvaille <sergesa@connectmmic.net>
>>>Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 19:38:22 -0500
>>>Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 23:11:30 -0500
>>>Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche'

<snip>

>>Serge responded:

>>>I have asked you, on
>>>this List, a couple of times, a few pointed questions based
>>>"specifically" on this secret hidden technology paradox inherent
>>>to your research-claims: you never answered the damn questions.

>Do you know how many emails I get daily - at least 200! Re-ask
>the questions and I'll try to answer them!

Tim,

Good!  Then, you will finally answer the following (4th try):

>What I can't figure out is how come silent-running vehicles,
>invisible to radar, designed for atmospheric and space flight,
>capable of hovering and stationary and vertical flight, that
>reach tremendous speeds and acceleration (from 0 to 1500 knots
>in seconds), are able to outpace any known conventional craft
>and are almost invulnerable to enemy attacks have been kept in
>the cupboard for more than 50 years ?

>Do you have any incentive on that ?

BTW, it seems Roger and I have the same problem: how many times
a pertinent question must be asked to get answered.

>How does your response affect the credibility of Mr Fouche and
>"associates"?

>Not one bit.

My post pointed out the fact that you were discrediting Fouche
with questions yourself did not answer in the past.  According
to the recent post "25 Rules of Disinformation", this is #4
("the Straw Man argument") and #7 ("Question motives").  Of
course, you could be accusing me of #14 ("Demand complete
solutions"), but that would be #17 ("Change the subject") from
your part.

My 2 cents this will be lost in a 200 daily e-mails shuffle:
that will be #1 ("... don't discuss it").

As for Edgar Fouche, I suggest you pass on to him Roger's pocket
and coat argument: it does fit the bill for him... too ;0)

Please giggle: I am just applying the #1 rule of information
("If you can't have fun, this is trouble").

Serge Salvaille