Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jan -> Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:41:52 +0000
Fwd Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:50:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?


>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:09:27 +0000
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

>If this info is correct, here we see that Santilli dealt with 15
>cans of undeveloped film. In addition, Santilli uses the terms
>"processing of the reels" and "development of the film" within
>the same context.

>I don't think for a minute he was talking about "transfer" to
>video.


Ray Santilli did have access to developing for old film.

There was a Kodak cartridge of old film which Mike Hesemann
bought from a lady in Roswell which was supposed to contain
images of the crash site.  It was unprocessed film.

Unfortunately, Mike gave it to Ray for processing, and later
got back a short portion of the film.  The part which had
actually gone through the camera was missing from what Ray
returned to Mike, and has never been accounted for.

I submitted the portion which had been processed to Eastman
Kodak for identification, and they verified that it had been
correctly developed, and from the edge markings and sprocket
spacing (which changed at several points) positively
identified it as 1945 production.

I still wonder what happened to the beginning of that film.

Bob