Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Roy Hale <roy.hale@virgin.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:32:33 +0100
Fwd Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 16:34:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed


>From: Matthew Williams <truthseekers@truthseekers.screaming.net>
>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed
>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:16:20 +0100

>Another interesting fact is how all of Max's witnesses changed
>their stories after you and Andy R. got to them. You then made
>big claims about how you could show that Max Burns had lied
>about their witness testimonies and that the witnesses were
>claiming their words had been twisted.

>However the truth of the situation, as you well know is that Max
>Burns played a tape recording of one witness who states that he
>was happy to allow Max to use his name, details of his statement
>and claimed that the man he encountered stank of aviation fuel.

>After you got to the witness the story changes to the witness
>having not given permission to Max to talk about his case - that
>Max had twisted his words. Your eyes lit up when you tried to
>use this against Max but sadly you have been put back in your
>seat because Max then produced the audio taped recording of this
>mans voice. So you neatly skip over this _major_ point in the
>case and go onto aircraft causing sonic booms being your latest
>evidence to damn Max's research with.
> http://globalserve.net/~updates/mufon/index.htm


I think this is an interesting point Matthew raises here.

Everyone at the Max Burns Lecture clearly heard Mr Dagenhart
express to Max his position and the clarity of his statement.

If Clarke & Roberts are stating that Mr Dagenhart did not say
the things he did, then How do they explain the taped phone call
between Max and Mr Dagenhart?

Concerning the interview which was given to Mr Dagenhart, by
Clarke & Roberts were these interviews taped so we can hear
their method of questioning? Only this would be interesting to
many researchers simply because they are stating that the
witness withdrew / denied what Max played (Audio Tape) at the
lecture.

Roy..