Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Rebecca Jackson <R.Jackson@TRENT.ITECNE.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:57:32 +0100 
Fwd Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 17:01:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed


>From: Roy Hale <roy.hale@virgin.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed
>Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:32:33 +0100

>>From: Matthew Williams <truthseekers@truthseekers.screaming.net>
>>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed
>>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:16:20 +0100

>>Another interesting fact is how all of Max's witnesses changed
>>their stories after you and Andy R. got to them. You then made
>>big claims about how you could show that Max Burns had lied
>>about their witness testimonies and that the witnesses were
>>claiming their words had been twisted.

>>However the truth of the situation, as you well know is that Max
>>Burns played a tape recording of one witness who states that he
>>was happy to allow Max to use his name, details of his statement
>>and claimed that the man he encountered stank of aviation fuel.

>>After you got to the witness the story changes to the witness
>>having not given permission to Max to talk about his case - that
>>Max had twisted his words. Your eyes lit up when you tried to
>>use this against Max but sadly you have been put back in your
>>seat because Max then produced the audio taped recording of this
>>mans voice. So you neatly skip over this _major_ point in the
>>case and go onto aircraft causing sonic booms being your latest
>>evidence to damn Max's research with.
>>http://globalserve.net/~updates/mufon/index.htm

>I think this is an interesting point Matthew raises here.

>Everyone at the Max Burns Lecture clearly heard Mr Dagenhart
>express to Max his position and the clarity of his statement.

>If Clarke & Roberts are stating that Mr Dagenhart did not say
>the things he did, then How do they explain the taped phone call
>between Max and Mr Dagenhart?

>Concerning the interview which was given to Mr Dagenhart, by
>Clarke & Roberts were these interviews taped so we can hear
>their method of questioning? Only this would be interesting to
>many researchers simply because they are stating that the
>witness withdrew / denied what Max played (Audio Tape) at the
>lecture.


I was with Max at the time he spoke to and recorded the Jonathon
Dagenhart interview. I know it is a true piece of evidence as I
was listening to the conversation.

I was also there when a very frightened Mr Dagenhart changed his
story after being 'pressured' I may not agreed with every
Sheffield Incident piece of 'evidence' but (although I cannot
rule out a very elaborate wind up) It was only after Dagenhart
had been pressured that his story changed.