Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Andy Roberts <Brigantia@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:02:48 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:52:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed


>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Max Burns UFO Hoax Exposed
>Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 16:49:31 +0100

Jenny Randles wrote:

snip......

>UpDates readers have, I think, been spared the embarrassing
>farce UK folk got in the past week where a Max Burns supporter
>attempted to put on the net evidence that would lead to the
>downfall of the credibility of Andy Roberts and Dave Clarke.

Jenny's objective support in the Sheffield case is welcomed -
although the belief facists will immediately say she has been
'silenced'! But she is far too demure in hinting at what has
been going on behind the scenes.........Let's name names eh?

The 'Max Burns supporter' she refers to is none other than
Matthew Williams who privately attempted to blackmail me if I
refused to stop pointing out some of the legal facts surrounding
Max Burns and his bribing of a key witness with marijuana.

<snip>

>Frankly, when a case descends to the point that discussing
>facts about the event takes second place to proffering alleged
>stories about the private lives of investigators, simply
>suggests to me a diversionary tactic.

Precisely Jenny - the Sheffield case is littered with
diversionary tactics because Burns and co simply cannot face up
to the fact they have no evidence to back up their claims. At
the risk of boring listers further, whatever Burns and co say,
do, allege or fantasise, in the end it all comes back to the
questions posed by Dr Clarke:


"1. I challenge Max to name the Tornado pilot he claims was
killed as a result of UFO action over the Peak District on March
24, 1997.

2. I challenge Max to name its base and its point of origin, and
provide proof that a 20 tonne Tornado has been lost and all
trace of its existence hidden from the public.

3. I challenge Max to produce one single eyewitness who saw a
UFO attack and destroy a Tornado aircraft over the Peak
District."


Entertaining though Burns and Williams may be in their inability
to realise that extraordinary claims require extraordinary
evidence. Until they answer even *one* of the above questions
conclusively they are just whistling in the wind.

Happy Trails

Andy