Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Leanne Martin <leanne_martin@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:08:51 PDT
Fwd Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:09:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Satanic Abuse


>Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 03:38:25 -0400
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
>Subject: Re: Satanic Abuse

>>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>>Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 21:35:21 +0000
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: Satanic Abuse

>>>Re: Satanic Abuse

Hi again List,

>>Leanne simply guesses in a way that "doesn't fit
>>into your personal world view," as you put it.

I didn't "guess" -  I simply asked the bleeding obvious as there
are people who will tell such stories for a range of reasons.
Just one of these reasons may be that the reporting individual
is experiencing/has experienced a delusional state as part of a
medical condition. It is only right and proper that anyone who
is investigating these types of claims consider this as a
possible reason for the report.

>Leanne is entitled to any "guesses" she may care to take. I was
>responding to her use of the term "condition" (implying
>something other than an _actual_experience_) when referring to
>reports of UFO abduction. Like I said, it would be nice to see
>some folks investigating what is being reported _first_ before
>creating explanations that they are comfortable with.  I don't
>recall seeing any reports of abduction or UFO sightings that
>were prefaced by; "because of my 'condition' I saw or
>experienced the following." Reports, especially contact reports
>from reputable, honest people should be checked out like cops
>do, _as they are reported_ before allowing ones own personal
>speculations to enter the picture.

Read and act on what I actually say or ask - not on what you
thought I said or asked.

Regards,
Leanne  ];-)