From: Michael Christol <mchristo@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:04:58 -0700
Fwd Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:02:56 -0400
Subject: Re: UFO Sighting: Santa Barbara, CA
>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 18:59:42 -0400
>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
>Subject: Re: UFO Sighting: Santa Barbara, CA
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:51:52 -0700
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: Michael Christol <mchristo@mindspring.com>
>>Subject: Re: UFO Sighting: Santa Barbara, CA
>>>From: stig.agermose@get2net.dk (Stig Agermose)
>>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>>Subject: UFO Sighting: Santa Barbara, CA
>>>Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 05:45:41 GMT>
>>>Source: "alt.paranet.ufo".
>>>Stig
>>>From: "MC" <mcannon@instanet.com>
>>>Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo
>>>Subject: UFO sighting: Santa Barbara, CA
>>>Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 05:46:28 -0700>
>>>Location: Near Stearns Wharf, Santa Barbara, CA.>
>>>Time: Between 8:00 and 9:00 p.m., last night.
>>>Category: High strangeness phenomena; multiple witness event.
>>>Witnesses report seeing unusual lights in sky over the beach
>>>roughly 1000 yards to the north of Stearns Wharf in Santa
>>>Barbara, California. Unusual light phenomena persisted for
>>>nearly an hour, occasionally accompanied by ineplicable auditory
>>>effects (whistling, frequent skyquakes, and a sound one witness
>>>described as "electrified crackling")..
>>>The light phenomena were surprisingly varied. A multi-colored
>>>array was visible to many witnesses, most of whom offer
>>>strikingly convergent reports. Lights pulsated, sometimes
>>>becoming so bright that the faces of nearby witnesses became
>>>illuminated.>
>>>On a number of occasions, white lights floated groundwards in a
>>>classic "falling leaf" pattern.>
>>>Smoke occasionally was visible, possibly due to alien propulsion
>>>system.
>>Just from the above description, what the witnesses may very
>>well have seen is one of the "Russian Cosmospheres."
>Another sucker gets bagged by a report of fireworks!
>>These devices were first introduced into the picture in the early
>>to mid-seventies. They used dual systems to propel them in those
>>early years...
>>1. Rocket thrusters to propell the "egg shapped," or "ball
>>shapped," vehicle up from the earth high enough to allow a
>>switch to a
>>2. magnetic motor with which it then propelled itself into a
>>high earth stationary position, where it could stay for
>>indefinite periods of time.>
>Sounds like a crock to me.
>>The "electrified crackling" is a dead give-a-way to the type of
>>propulsion system it is using...as previously described. The
>>"skyquakes" is also a bi-product of discharging the vehicles
>>particle beam weapon into the atmosphere causing the air to
>>superheat and thus explode...thus there is no visible evidence
>>of a weapon of any type. No damage, no evidence...just a shock
>>wave which can be tracked and recorded for many miles.>
>>Many may not be aware of these "Cosmospheres." But I assure you
>>that the did and do exist.
>You can assure me? Prove it... without reference to someone
>else.
>> Russia has improved these devices in
>>the last ten years to where they no longer require the "rocket
>>thrusters" to get it airborn. They can now fly entirely by
>>magnetic propulsion.
>>You may ask where to the get the energy to power these vehicles.
>>It is quite simple. They use Nuclear Energy. These vehicles
>>are shielded to protect the crew from radiation. It also used
>>this nuclear reactor to provide power to the "particle beam"
>>weapons, used for whatever purpose they were told.
>How heavy do you think the SHIELDING on the reactor might
>me.....to protect a living crew from being fried while said
>reactor is generating megawatts of power?
>>It appears they were used to destroy American Spy Satellites in
><snip>
>>turn of the American Space Station, "Sky Lab", to earth.
>Crock.
>>There are many stories of these vehicles being used by Russia to
>>maintain military equalibriumn in the 1980's...especially during
>>the Falkland Island war between Britain and Argentina.
>Many stories? Never heard on before.
>>For those of you who want more information on these vehicles, I
>>suggest you find and read the discourses of Dr. David Peter
>>Beter, which were transcribed from audio taped radio interviews
>>which Dr. Beter did on a weekly basis. He died in 1982 of a
>>heart attack, and thus ended his reports on the "non-pullic"
>>activities occurring in the world by the worlds governments and
>>military powers.
>>I'm sure you will remember many or most of the incidents he
>>reports on, from the headlines of TV, Radio, and Newspaper
>>reports at that time. It is what you did not read, or hear that
>>Dr. Beter told them.
>Never heard of this guy. Reported in Weekly World News, perhaps?
Bruce, You are a nice guy and all that, and you have a good
heart, so I won't say anything. But, in this case, you need to
do your own homework.
<smile>
Oh, I don't mind the bashing... I'm used to it. <G>
REgards, Mike
Download ICQ at http://www.icq.com/
ICQ#:7508455
BBS: (270) 683-3026
Fax: (270) 686-7394
Home: (270) 683-6811
---
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com